The first time around might be a trial, but if we did a quick review before regression testing each minor release, once the first one was done, it would probably be an easy task. Obviously it would be beneficial to the stability of the platform considering the amount of transitive bug fixes we'd be likely to pull in. +1
-- sands fish Software Engineer MIT Libraries Technology Research & Development sa...@mit.edu<mailto:sa...@mit.edu> E25-131 On May 5, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote: Should we make it a point to review dependency versions at each minor (m.n.0) release, or at least annually? -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu<mailto:mw...@iupui.edu> Balance your desire for bells and whistles with the reality that only a little more than 2 percent of world population has broadband. -- Ledford and Tyler, _Google Analytics 2.0_ <ATT00001><ATT00002.c><ATT00003.c>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Dspace-devel mailing list Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel