The first time around might be a trial, but if we did a quick review before 
regression testing each minor release, once the first one was done, it would 
probably be an easy task.  Obviously it would be beneficial to the stability of 
the platform considering the amount of transitive bug fixes we'd be likely to 
pull in.  +1

--
sands fish
Software Engineer
MIT Libraries
Technology Research & Development
sa...@mit.edu<mailto:sa...@mit.edu>
E25-131




On May 5, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:

Should we make it a point to review dependency versions at each minor
(m.n.0) release, or at least annually?

--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   mw...@iupui.edu<mailto:mw...@iupui.edu>
Balance your desire for bells and whistles with the reality that only a
little more than 2 percent of world population has broadband.
-- Ledford and Tyler, _Google Analytics 2.0_
<ATT00001><ATT00002.c><ATT00003.c>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to