Hi,
As you know, all "metadatavalue" records have their own "authority" and
"confidence" fields. We are using these fields. The intermediate XML of
XOAI
does not include data of these fields. So we can not translate it with any
xslt.
For example, please check the following url,
http://dspace.lib.kanazawa-u.ac.jp/dspace-oai/request?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=junii2&identifier=oai:dspace.lib.kanazawa-u.ac.jp:2297/30366
There is a following "creator" element which has "id" attribute.
<creator id="http://rns.nii.ac.jp/nr/1000090253335";>Hasegawa, Hiroshi
</creator>
In this element, "Hasegawa, Hiroshi" is from "text_value" field and
"1000090253335"
is
from "authority" field of the one metadatavalue record
(dc.contributor.author).
And we also use the "confidence" field of the record in order to judge
whether
we should include this attribute.
I hope that you understand our situation by this explanation.
Thank you,
Keiji Suzuki
Ebetsu Japan
2012/7/25 DSpace @ Lyncode <[email protected]>
> Hi SUZUKI,
>
> OAI 2.0 exposed metadata could be easily changed. In fact one just need to
> change a specific XSL file (for example, using oai_dc schema:
> https://github.com/lyncode/DSpace/blob/dspace-with-xoai/dspace/config/modules/oai/metadataFormats/oai_dc.xsl).
> OAI 2.0 backward-compatiblity is of the most importance.
>
> As so i've opened an issue (https://github.com/lyncode/DSpace/issues/40).
> But could you be more specific? Which metadata fields aren't exposed? In
> which metadata schema?
>
> The referred 100% backward-compatiblity was tested against some validators
> and also some service providers.
>
>
> On 25 July 2012 06:23, SUZUKI Keiji <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems there are two problems in the current XOAI about its
>> backward-compatiblity.
>>
>> 1) It seems XOAI ignores authority and confidence data of metadata.
>> Many Japanese repositories use these data to identify the author
>> in the crosswalk for the domestic metadata format.
>>
>> 2) The form of bitstreams' url are for XMLUI although we set JSPUI as a
>> "bitstreams.baseUrl" property in the xoai.cfg.
>>
>> The latter is a trivial and seems to be easy to fix, but if the former
>> is true, we will be able to change to XOAI.
>>
>> Keiji Suzuki
>> Ebetsu, Japan
>>
>> 2012/7/20 DSpace @ Lyncode <[email protected]>
>>
>> Yes, the default context (/request) is 100% backward-compatible.
>>>
>>> On 19 July 2012 17:01, Sands Alden Fish <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Forgive my ignorance here, but just wanted to be clear. Is the new
>>>> OAI 100% backward-compatible, so that it includes all of the feature-set
>>>> and identical interfaces/URL spaces that the original implementation has?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks, DSpace @ Lyncode
> DSpace Department
> *Lyncode*: Official website <http://www.lyncode.com/>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
