Regarding the LNI discussions, there's a ticket related to removing LNI 
from default DSpace. The suggestion is that we move it to its own 
separate GitHub project (and folks who want to use and maintain it still 
can). As far as I'm aware though, we have little (if any) users of LNI 
these days.

Here's that ticket:
https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/DS-2124

As noted in the ticket's comments, this topic was also discussed in a 
developer meeting on Sept 24, at which point Robin pointed out that PURE 
still uses LNI:
http://irclogs.duraspace.org/index.php?date=2014-09-24

Hope that helps to fill in the gaps here.

- Tim

On 11/14/2014 4:50 AM, TAYLOR Robin wrote:
> Hi helix84,
>
> Apologies, there were some discussions but I've just checked my emails and 
> realise they were not copied to any list but just between Hardy, myself and 
> Tim. The history is that Hardy was in the process of decommissioning the LNI 
> module for version 5 on the assumption that nobody actually used it. It was 
> mentioned in a weekly developer meeting at which point I intervened and asked 
> if it could stay as we do make use of it. We have a product called PURE from 
> Elsevier that talks to DSpace using the LNI. We spoke to Elsevier and there 
> is one other site that has the same set up in place. A compromise was agreed 
> that the LNI would stay but be made optional for version 5 with the 
> expectation that it would be dropped for version 6. That having been said, I 
> completely agree that there should be a public consultation before dropping 
> it completely.
>
> Cheers, Robin.
>
> Robin Taylor
> Main Library
> University of Edinburgh
> ________________________________________
> From: ivan.ma...@gmail.com <ivan.ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of helix84 
> <heli...@centrum.sk>
> Sent: 14 November 2014 10:25
> To: TAYLOR Robin
> Cc: dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Dspace-devel] Maven optional modules
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> last year we talked about making LNI optional because it has only a
> few users, so the reason was to reduce build times. I don't remember
> us talking about dropping it (confirmed by a quick search in IRC
> logs). I don't see a reason to drop something that we have that is a
> standard (WebDAV). In any case, this would be a good time for LNI
> users to speak up.
>
>
> Regards,
> ~~helix84
>
> Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette
> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to