Diggory Mark wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Andrew Marlow wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:41 AM, mikan.d.dspace listmail 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Andew,
>>     If I remember correctly, DSpace 2.0 should not be dependent on
>>     database software, so you can use whatever DB you like. 
>>
>>
>> Having looked some more into DSpace 2.0 I think it is not ready 
>> enough. I hope someone will correct me if I am wrong. DSpace 1.5.1 
>> seems eminently usable to me and seems to have most of the 
>> functionality that I require. So it seems to me that an increment to 
>> support MySQL is more appropriate. I wonder who else is using or 
>> considering using DSpace 1.5.1 with MySQL....?
>
> Yes, 2.0 is not going to be giving you an immediate solution to your 
> problem.
>
> I would recommend exploring this further, I'm not sure why 
> there hasn't been a port to MySQL placed into dspace/etc/myslq/*.sql 
> yet. It would be a starting point for customization.  The challenge 
> with porting to any other SQL dialect with DSpace is that there are 
> conditional blocks of code peppered throughout the implementation that 
> are vendor specific, you may find yourself adding conditions to these 
> for mysql where appropriate.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
>>
>>
>>     2008/12/24 Andrew Marlow <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>     > By trawling the web I see that othershave asked in the past
>>     about DSpace
>>     > supporting MySQL. Soneone even submitted a patch for it, I
>>     believe, but this
>>     > appears not to have made it into 1.5.1. However, versions with
>>     the changes
>>     > necessary for MySQL are out there. See the article about one
>>     million items
>>     > at http://digital-scholarship.org/digitalkoans/category/dspace.
>>     So I was
>>     > wondering, what plans are there to officially support mySQL?
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Andrew M.
>> http://www.andrewpetermarlow.co.uk
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
>> It is the best place to buy or sell services for
>> just about anything Open Source.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB_______________________________________________
>> DSpace-tech mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Mark R. Diggory
> _http://purl.org/net/mdiggory/homepage_
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It is the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> DSpace-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>   
We carried out a MySQL port a couple of years back for DSpace 1.3(?) and 
found that some Java code changes were required. However, these were 
centralized and so the number of changes and the amount of change 
required were minimal. Mark is absolutely correct, most updates required 
additions to the db connection condition statements to account for MySQL.

We submitted a patch with the MySQL port but it was not accepted, but if 
we find the time and resources we may attempt submitting another.

Cheers


Hayden

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to