Hi Christophe, that shouldn't be too diffult as their evaluation is based on ROAR and openDOAR.
Sunny greetings Claudia Jürgen Dupriez Christophe schrieb: > Nice chart! > > It would be interesting to make another one (if possible) counting > publications instead of instances (number of publications by repository > software). But may be those figures are hard to find... > > Have a nice day! > > Christophe > > --- En date de : Mer 18.3.09, Bram Luyten <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> De: Bram Luyten <[email protected]> >> Objet: Re: [Dspace-tech] institutional repository ranking and page rank >> À: "Claudia Jürgen" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "DSpace Tech" <[email protected]> >> Date: Mercredi 18 Mars 2009, 17h06 >> Thanks Claudia, >> >> very nice ! >> >> I'm very amazed to see so few fedora repositories in >> there. I made a quick summary about the numbers from your >> file: >> >> DSpace 131 >> ePrints 61 >> not specified 32 >> >> bepress 21 >> Opus 9 >> ETD-db 6 >> HAL 5 >> CDSWare 4 >> eDoc 3 >> ETD 3 >> Cocoon 2 >> Cybertesis 2 >> Diva-Portal 2 >> dLibra 2 >> ePub 2 >> MyCore 2 >> Wildfire 2 >> Archimedes 1 >> >> DITED 1 >> DOKS 1 >> Fedora 1 >> Mikrobeta 1 >> Miless 1 >> Orbit 1 >> Perseus 1 >> Voorportaal 1 >> VTS 1 >> ZyImage 1 >> >> In attachment, a representation as a pie chart, where I >> grouped all of the softwares with less than 4 occurences >> under "other". (so you could argue that >> "other" and "not specified" are the >> same. >> >> >> best regards, >> >> Bram >> >> @mire NV >> Technologielaan 9 (New address !) >> 3001 Heverlee >> Belgium >> +32 2 888 29 56 >> >> http://www.atmire.com - >> Institutional Repository Solutions >> >> http://www.togather.eu - >> Before getting together, get t...@ther >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:55 PM, >> Claudia Jürgen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> for those interested the top 300 IR's Jan 09 by CSIC >> can be found at: >> >> http://hdl.handle.net/2003/26032 >> >> for download (enhanced with software used and page rank). >> >> >> >> Claudia Jürgen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bram Luyten schrieb: >> >> >> Very interesting, didn't know they had a January >> edition. >> >> I will compare the standings of institutions that are also >> included in my >> >> Google Analytics Stats research, and see if the order >> "matches" the order in >> >> this ranking. >> >> If the orders match, it could be a useful indicator that >> both webometrics >> >> and Google Analytics measure results in similar ways. >> >> >> >> However, if there is a (big) difference, it might be worth >> investigating >> >> further. >> >> >> >> thanks for bringing this up Claudia, >> >> >> >> Bram >> >> PS: I submitted part of the current findings of the GA >> Stats research as a >> >> proposal for OR09, but if you still want to share your >> stats, please do .. >> >> the more included repositories, the more reliable the >> results. >> >> >> >> @mire NV >> >> Romeinse Straat 18 >> >> 3001 Heverlee >> >> Belgium >> >> +32 2 888 29 56 >> >> >> >> http://www.atmire.com - >> Institutional Repository Solutions >> >> http://www.togather.eu - >> Before getting together, get t...@ther >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Claudia Jürgen < >> >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> most of you are aware of the repository ranking: >> >> http://repositories.webometrics.info/index.html >> >> >> >> Due to a question on GUDE I was curious about the relation >> of this >> >> ranking to page ranking and did a check on the top 300 >> institutional >> >> repositories in the CSIC ranking: >> >> >> >> Of the top 100 institutional repositories 41 use DSpace and >> these got an >> >> average page ranking of 6.44. >> >> Of the top 300 institutional repositories 115 use DSpace >> and these got >> >> an average page ranking of 6.08. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thought some of you might be interested >> >> >> >> Claudia Jürgen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, >> San Francisco, >> >> CA >> >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open >> Sourcing the >> >> Enterprise >> >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open >> source >> >> participation >> >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the >> source code: >> >> SFAD >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> DSpace-tech mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex >> Builder(TM) are >> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform >> capabilities. Quickly and >> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the >> Eclipse(TM)based development >> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through >> debugging. >> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com >> -----La pièce jointe associée suit----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DSpace-tech mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
