On 26 July 2010 14:30, Hilton Gibson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
>  From what I understand the "lift-date" is calculated from the terms set.
> See: http://www.dspace.org/1_6_2Documentation/ch05.html#N13421
> I think the terms can be input as 1 year, 6 months, 1 month from submit
> date.
> Maybe thats how it works.
>
> Cheers
>
> hg

2010/7/26 Claudia Jürgen <[email protected]>:
> Hello,
>
> the default setter understands only a date string or the (configurable)
> term "forever". You can implement your own setter to use other terms,
> e.g. to calculate the lift date based on time spans, for more details
> see section:
> 5.2.17.2. Extending Embargo Functionality
> of the documentation.
>
> Hope that helps
>
> Claudia Jürgen


Thanks Hilton and Claudia

I had misunderstood the purpose of embargo.field.terms.

So I should use this field to set the date on which I want the embargo
lifted, alternatively I could enter a duration in it?

And I should not use embargo.field.lift in my submission form as this
value gets calculated from what is entered into embargo.field.terms?

So I suppose I could simply use this in my input form:

       <field>
         <dc-schema>dc</dc-schema>
         <dc-element>rights</dc-element>
         <dc-qualifier></dc-qualifier>
         <repeatable>false</repeatable>
         <label>Embargo Lift Date</label>
         <input-type>date</input-type>
         <hint> If applicable, enter the date that the embargo can be
lifted.</hint>
         <required></required>
       </field>

With this in dspace.cfg:

embargo.field.terms = dc.rights
embargo.field.lift = dc.date


I suppose that's what this was trying to tell me:
"
Do not place the field for 'lift date' in submission screens. This can
potentially confuse submitters because they may feel that they can
directly assign values to it. As noted in the life-cycle above, this
is erroneous: the lift date gets assigned by the embargo system based
on the terms. Any pre-existing value will be over-written. But see
next recommendation for an exception.
"

But then:
"
As the life-cycle discussion above makes clear, after the terms are
applied, that field is no longer actionable in the embargo system.
Conversely, the 'lift date' field is not actionable *until* the
application. Thus you may want to consider configuring both the
'terms' and 'lift date' to use the same metadata field. In this way,
during workflow you would see only the terms, and after item
installation, only the lift date. If you wish the metadata to retain
the terms for any reason, use two distinct fields instead.
"

This seems to suggest I could have the following in dspace.cfg:

embargo.field.terms = dc.rights
embargo.field.lift = dc.rights

... with only dc.rights in my input form?

Does that sound about right? (From my testing it does seem to work.)

Sean
-- 
Sean Carte
esAL Library Systems Manager
+27 72 898 8775
+27 31 373 2490
fax: 0866741254
http://esal.dut.ac.za/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share 
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;226879339;13503038;l?
http://clk.atdmt.com/CRS/go/247765532/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to