I think he was trying to say that dspam is awesome and after just a few days, its accuracy was amazing. That's my take at least.
Ed On 7/29/2010 5:23 PM, Stevan Bajić wrote: >> I'm amazed by dspam's performance, even after just a few days. When was >> the >> last time you had a FP that was rated above 90% ? Above 95% ? > I don't understand that question. Can you rephrase it? > > btw: It is YOU who is influencing that accuracy. If you don't re-train or > you re-train wrongly then you influence in a bad way the accuracy. But if > you do what you are supposed to do (fix errors by re-training) then the > code in DSPAM is there to deliver one of the best accuracy you find in > todays Anti-Spam tools. So all what DSPAM does is that it uses your input > and calculates with algorithms the probability and confidence of a message > being Spam (Spam, Blacklisted, Blocklisted, Virus) or Ham (Innocent, > Whitelisted). Nothing more and nothing less :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
