Hi Stevan, Apologies, it seems I wasn't clear at all. Let me explain and rephrase it.
On Thursday 29 July 2010 17:23:55 Stevan Bajić wrote : > > From what I've seen (please correct me if I'm wrong!) a quarantine agent > > is > > the only way to quarantine spams with a low level of confidence, while > > silently dropping spams with a high level of confidence. > > DSPAM is NOT dropping the messages. It just has the option to quarantine > anything that is classified as "not wanted" (aka: Spam, Virus, Blacklisted, > Blocklisted). That was my point, actually :) What *I* would like to implement is a threshold to quarantine/drop: - Anything that is classified as spam with, let's say, 90% of confidence or more would get dropped. - Anything below this confidence would be quarantined. As I understand it, this behaviour would only be possible with an alternative quarantine agent. > > I'm amazed by dspam's performance, even after just a few days. When was > > the > > last time you had a FP that was rated above 90% ? Above 95% ? > > I don't understand that question. Can you rephrase it? OK, here it is: Dspam is fantastic :) After as few as six days of training, whitout even starting with a corpus, the extremely few false positive that I get are classified with a confidence below 60%. This is why I believe that I could safely drop "most certainly spams" instead of putting them in quarantine. Best regards, Amand.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
