On Aug 15, 2010, at 14:12 , Julien Valroff wrote:

> Le dimanche 15 août 2010 à 14:00:23 (-0600), Kurt Albershardt a écrit :
>> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:00:23 -0600
>> From: Kurt Albershardt <k...@nv.net>
>> To: Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net>, dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: hacking Ubuntu to use kirya.net repository
>> 
>> Been trying to get Julien's repository to work semi-automatically for this 
>> new Ubuntu box and I seem to have hit a snag with my version pinning config. 
>>  I'm used to the /etc/apt/preferences file format, but now I see there is a 
>> preferences.d directory, which is certainly a cleaner way to manage it.
>> 
>> I have the following at the end of my sources.lst file:
>> 
>> deb http://packages.kirya.net/debian/ sid main contrib non-free
>> deb-src http://packages.kirya.net/debian/ sid main contrib non-free 
> 
> I only build DSPAM packages for the stable release, and not for sid (aka 
> unstable).

D'oh (slaps head.)
Looks close enough to work with an explicit call to install from lenny:

$ sudo apt-get -s install -t lenny dspam
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
 dspam-doc libdspam7 procmail
Suggested packages:
 clamav-daemon dspam-webfrontend libdspam7-drv
The following NEW packages will be installed:
 dspam dspam-doc libdspam7 procmail
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Inst procmail (3.22-18ubuntu1 Ubuntu:10.04/lucid)
Inst libdspam7 (3.9.1~rc1+git20100814-1 Kirya unofficial packages:5.0/stable)
Inst dspam (3.9.1~rc1+git20100814-1 Kirya unofficial packages:5.0/stable)
Inst dspam-doc (3.9.1~rc1+git20100814-1 Kirya unofficial packages:5.0/stable)
Conf procmail (3.22-18ubuntu1 Ubuntu:10.04/lucid)
Conf libdspam7 (3.9.1~rc1+git20100814-1 Kirya unofficial packages:5.0/stable)
Conf dspam (3.9.1~rc1+git20100814-1 Kirya unofficial packages:5.0/stable)
Conf dspam-doc (3.9.1~rc1+git20100814-1 Kirya unofficial packages:5.0/stable)


Though something is still not quite right on the policy (as best as I can tell):

$apt-cache policy
Package files:
[snip]
Pinned packages:
    dspam -> (not found)




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to