On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:49 PM, David Rees <dree...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been running dspam for a while and have a few users using it with good > filtering rates, although I had noticed that on my account despite repeated > training there are certain newsletters that continue to get tagged as false > positives. I chalked it up to using TEFT mode for quite a while after some > research and switched to TUM. > > But now I've started a new user which receives a good volume of extremely > predictable SPAM and despite training these mails continue to be delivered > with a typical Confidence of 0.9899 and Probability of 0.0000.
Following up on this list for the archives: The systems affected by this were running PostgreSQL 9.2. But dspam was linked against either 8.4 or 9.0. Recompiling dspam against 9.2 seems to have solved the problem - will do more testing to confirm for sure! -Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
