On 06/13/2013 08:53 PM, P.V.Anthony wrote: > On 14/06/2013 04:41, David Rees wrote: > >> Following up on this list for the archives: The systems affected by >> this were running PostgreSQL 9.2. But dspam was linked against either >> 8.4 or 9.0. Recompiling dspam against 9.2 seems to have solved the >> problem - will do more testing to confirm for sure! > > Oh no. > > I hope the rpm package I am using in CentOS 6 64bit is complied againt > PostgreSQL 9.2. I am using PostgreSQL 9.2. > > Any comments from the person who packages dspam for CentOS 6 64bit?
It'll be linked against whatever PostgreSQL is available from RHEL. I would surmise that postgres 9.2 isn't in the stock CentOS/EPEL repos? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
