On 14/06/2013 04:41, David Rees wrote: > Following up on this list for the archives: The systems affected by > this were running PostgreSQL 9.2. But dspam was linked against either > 8.4 or 9.0. Recompiling dspam against 9.2 seems to have solved the > problem - will do more testing to confirm for sure!
Oh no. I hope the rpm package I am using in CentOS 6 64bit is complied againt PostgreSQL 9.2. I am using PostgreSQL 9.2. Any comments from the person who packages dspam for CentOS 6 64bit? P.V.Anthony ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
