-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:46:40 -0800 > Von: Jason Axley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [dspam-users] dspam 3.8.0 strangeness with message tagging
> So, now that I've upgraded dspam, I've got a few messages in my inbox > that were not tagged, but do have some of the dspam headers. Although > the probability is a -1.00 (not positive). Is there a known bug with > the classification that is resulting in a negative number that should be > positive and that results in dspam not classifying this correctly? > Not that I am aware of. But negative values could result if you got negative values in the statistics for spam or ham or the other data in the statistics. Could you send your dspam.conf file and possibly the result of dspam_stats -H <your_dspam_username>? And maybe what platform you are using, what driver you are using, what compiler you are using, what compiler version, what cpu and in what bit length. > Subject: Woman Treadmill Car Desk Teeth > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:50:16 -0600 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="windows-1250" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3338.1 > Importance: Normal > X-DSPAM-Result: > X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Nov 30 19:10:29 2007 > X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6000 > X-DSPAM-Probability: -1.0000 > > Dspam is releasing the messages for delivery so they are not being > dropped. Anyone seen this? Do any of those 37+ patches to 3.8.0 > address this? > > It appears as if it actually does write the signatures correctly: > > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.254909] Received*ESMTP (1frq, > 14861s, 16 > 12i) > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.256868] Received*with+ESMTP > (1frq, 15024 > s, 1613i) > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.258558] Url*com (1frq, 4332s, > 461i) > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.739962] X-Mailer*Outlook (1frq, > 8128s, 1 > 06i) > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.731731] > Content-Type*charset="Windows+12 > 52" (1frq, 1176s, 16i) > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Graham-Bayesian Probability: 1.000000 > Samples: 15 > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Burton-Bayesian Probability: 1.000000 > Samples: 27 > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] using Graham factors > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Result Confidence: 0.60 > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Control: [10 10] [11 10] Delta: [1 0] > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] total processing time: 0.15061s > 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] saving signature as 4,4750d0a132571247520850 > > And viewing with the web tool shows all of the messages marked as spam. > It's just that the messages are not being tagged correctly. But it's > only some messages... > > Regards, > > -Jason -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
