-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:25:59 -0800 > Von: Jason Axley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] dspam 3.8.0 strangeness with message tagging
> gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: i486-linux-gnu > Configured with: ../src/configure -v > --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr > --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib > --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls > --program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu > --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --enable-checking=release > i486-linux-gnu > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4) > > Compilation options in the package: > > $ ../configure --host=i486-linux-gnu --build=i486-linux-gnu > --prefix=/usr --includedir=/usr/include --mandir=/usr/share/man > --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-logdir=/var/log/dspam/ > --localstatedir=/var --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dspam --srcdir=.. > --with-dspam-home=/var/spool/dspam --sysconfdir=/etc/dspam > --enable-domain-scale --enable-signature-headers > --with-delivery-agent=/usr/bin/procmail --enable-daemon > --with-mysql-includes=/usr/include/mysql > --with-pgsql-includes=/usr/include/postgresql > --with-storage-driver=libdb4_drv,mysql_drv,pgsql_drv,sqlite3_drv,hash_drv > --enable-ldap --enable-debug --enable-virtual-users > --enable-preferences-extension --enable-clamav > > uname -a > Linux void 2.6.20-16-server #2 SMP Sun Sep 23 19:57:25 UTC 2007 i686 > GNU/Linux > > dspam_stats -H <my user> > TP True Positives: 219388 > TN True Negatives: 16271 > FP False Positives: 474 > FN False Negatives: 1027 > SC Spam Corpusfed: 3316 > NC Nonspam Corpusfed: 0 > TL Training Left: 0 > SHR Spam Hit Rate 99.53% > HSR Ham Strike Rate: 2.83% > OCA Overall Accuracy: 99.37% > > dspam.conf: > > Home /var/spool/dspam > StorageDriver /usr/lib/dspam/libmysql_drv.so > DeliveryHost 127.0.0.1 > DeliveryPort 10025 > DeliveryIdent localhost > DeliveryProto SMTP > OnFail error > Trust root > Trust dspam > Trust mail > Trust mailnull > Trust smmsp > Trust daemon > DebugOpt process spam fp classify > Debug * > TrainingMode toe > TestConditionalTraining on > Feature whitelist > Algorithm graham burton > Tokenizer chain > PValue bcr > WebStats on > Preference "spamAction=tag" > Preference "signatureLocation=message" # 'message' or 'headers' > Preference "showFactors=off" > Preference "spamSubject=[***SPAM***]" > AllowOverride trainingMode > AllowOverride spamAction spamSubject > AllowOverride statisticalSedation > AllowOverride enableBNR > AllowOverride enableWhitelist > AllowOverride signatureLocation > AllowOverride showFactors > AllowOverride optIn optOut > AllowOverride whitelistThreshold > HashRecMax 98317 > HashAutoExtend on > HashMaxExtents 0 > HashExtentSize 49157 > HashPctIncrease 10 > HashMaxSeek 10 > HashConnectionCache 10 > Notifications off > PurgeSignatures 14 # Stale signatures > PurgeNeutral 90 # Tokens with neutralish probabilities > PurgeUnused 90 # Unused tokens > PurgeHapaxes 30 # Tokens with less than 5 hits (hapaxes) > PurgeHits1S 15 # Tokens with only 1 spam hit > PurgeHits1I 15 # Tokens with only 1 innocent hit > LocalMX 127.0.0.1 > SystemLog on > UserLog on > Opt out > TrackSources [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ServerPID /var/run/dspam/dspam.pid > ServerMode auto > ServerParameters "--deliver=innocent -d %u" > ServerIdent "localhost.localdomain" > ServerDomainSocketPath "/var/spool/postfix/tmp/dspam.sock" > ProcessorURLContext on > ProcessorBias on > Include /etc/dspam/dspam.d/ > What is inside /etc/dspam/dspam.d/? > It's 32-bit linux, BTW. And I'm using MySQL as the driver with standard > settings except I enabled the MySQLUIDinSignature option. > > Thanks! > > -Jason > > Steve wrote: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > >> Datum: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:46:40 -0800 > >> Von: Jason Axley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> An: [email protected] > >> Betreff: [dspam-users] dspam 3.8.0 strangeness with message tagging > >> > > > > > >> So, now that I've upgraded dspam, I've got a few messages in my inbox > >> that were not tagged, but do have some of the dspam headers. Although > >> the probability is a -1.00 (not positive). Is there a known bug with > >> the classification that is resulting in a negative number that should > be > >> positive and that results in dspam not classifying this correctly? > >> > >> > > Not that I am aware of. But negative values could result if you got > negative values in the statistics for spam or ham or the other data in the > statistics. Could you send your dspam.conf file and possibly the result of > dspam_stats -H <your_dspam_username>? And maybe what platform you are using, > what driver you are using, what compiler you are using, what compiler > version, what cpu and in what bit length. > > > > > > > >> Subject: Woman Treadmill Car Desk Teeth > >> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:50:16 -0600 > >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> MIME-Version: 1.0 > >> Content-Type: text/plain; > >> charset="windows-1250" > >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) > >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3338.1 > >> Importance: Normal > >> X-DSPAM-Result: > >> X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Nov 30 19:10:29 2007 > >> X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6000 > >> X-DSPAM-Probability: -1.0000 > >> > >> Dspam is releasing the messages for delivery so they are not being > >> dropped. Anyone seen this? Do any of those 37+ patches to 3.8.0 > >> address this? > >> > >> It appears as if it actually does write the signatures correctly: > >> > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.254909] Received*ESMTP (1frq, > >> 14861s, 16 > >> 12i) > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.256868] Received*with+ESMTP > >> (1frq, 15024 > >> s, 1613i) > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.258558] Url*com (1frq, 4332s, > >> 461i) > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.739962] X-Mailer*Outlook (1frq, > >> 8128s, 1 > >> 06i) > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] [burton] [0.731731] > >> Content-Type*charset="Windows+12 > >> 52" (1frq, 1176s, 16i) > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Graham-Bayesian Probability: 1.000000 > >> Samples: 15 > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Burton-Bayesian Probability: 1.000000 > >> Samples: 27 > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] using Graham factors > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Result Confidence: 0.60 > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] Control: [10 10] [11 10] Delta: [1 0] > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] total processing time: 0.15061s > >> 3257: [11/30/2007 19:10:25] saving signature as > 4,4750d0a132571247520850 > >> > >> And viewing with the web tool shows all of the messages marked as spam. > > >> It's just that the messages are not being tagged correctly. But it's > >> only some messages... > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -Jason > >> > > > > > -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
