-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:01:36 +1000 > Von: Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Newbie
> On 2008-01-06 04:47 pm, Dov Zamir wrote: > > > Hi folks, just trying out dspam for the first time on a > > > debian box with courier-mta and maildrop using dspam 3.6.8 > > > and the libdspam7-drv-sqlite3 deb package. Messages are > > > delivered to my Inbox but there is no sign of any dspam > > > X-DSPAM-Result header. Any suggestions ? > > > > You have Opt in in the configuration file. You need to specifically aopt > > in by adding the required file to your mail box, or change the setting > > to Opt out. > > Right, thanks. I had a .dspam folder in my virtual homedir but > I guess that was in the wrong area and not being detected. > > Messages are coming through okay now and there Dspam headers > appears okay, great, but I am not getting any sign of any spam > filtering after 100 retrained spams. This is my [EMAIL PROTECTED] > alias... > > # cat .courier-spam > |/usr/bin/dspam --user [EMAIL PROTECTED] --addspam > --addspam is not a valid DSPAM parameter. Please read the documentation to see how to flag a message as spam/ham. > and this is the log of the last message I sent to the above alias... > > 1199600994 I "Kirk, Mauricio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 47807562322297730779061 New global company. Delivered > 1199601937 I "Kirk, Mauricio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 4780791112521214316380 New global company. Delivered > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You are NOT learning the message! You need to add/use other parameters. > the first instance is as it was originally delivered and the > second is (I presume) what was bounced back to be retrained. > And this is the Dspam header of the above message... > > X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent > X-DSPAM-Processed: Sun Jan 6 16:29:54 2008 > X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 > X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 9809 chance of being spam > X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 > X-DSPAM-Signature: 47807562322297730779061 > X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, > Received-SPF*does+not, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*does+not, 0.01000, > Received*mail.renta.net+with, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*does, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*does, 0.01000, > 300%, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*pass+the, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*pass+the, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*remoteip=, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*remoteip=, 0.01000, > Date*Sun+6, 0.01000, > Received*esmtp+Sun, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*Sender, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*Sender, 0.01000, > Short, 0.01000, > PRICE+$0, 0.01000, > company, 0.01000, > Term+$, 0.01000, > Issued+A, 0.01000, > Received*ffff, 0.01000, > We+Issued, 0.01000, > Last+Time, 0.01000, > Received*Jan+2008, 0.01000, > Gains+in, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*the+Sender, 0.01000, > Received-SPF*the+Sender, 0.01000, > To*markc+renta.net, 0.01000 > > I'm not sure what to expect for a detected spam because I have not > seen one yet. Should I keep manually retraining until about 200+ > before seeing some sign of active filtering or have I possibly got > some config error ? > On my setup I don't need to retrain that much to see DSPAM accuracy getting higher. Please fix your parameters and replace the --addspam with the proper parameters. For example: |/usr/bin/dspam --user [EMAIL PROTECTED] --class=spam --source=error > --markc > // SteveB -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail
