-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:21:48 +1000
> Von: Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Newbie

> On 2008-01-06 09:08 pm, Steve wrote:
> > --addspam is not a valid DSPAM parameter. Please read the
> > documentation to see how to flag a message as spam/ham. 
> 
> Great, thanks. I guess I read an old howto from somewhere.
> Now that I have some idea how Dspam works I am rtfm'ing.
> 
> > On my setup I don't need to retrain that much to see DSPAM
> > accuracy getting higher. Please fix your parameters and
> > replace the --addspam with the proper parameters. For example:  
> > |/usr/bin/dspam --user [EMAIL PROTECTED] --class=spam --source=error
> 
> That made a difference. I just got my very first spam in
> my .Dspam folder after only 8 retrains, that is excellent :)
> 
DSPAM is quick in learning. What tokenizer are you using?
If you want faster learning, then look into switching to 3.8.0 (I think you use 
3.6.8).


> # dspam_stats -H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>                 TP True Positives:              1
>                 TN True Negatives:              7
>                 FP False Positives:             0
>                 FN False Negatives:             8
>                 SC Spam Corpusfed:              0
>                 NC Nonspam Corpusfed:           0
>                 TL Training Left:            2493
>                 SHR Spam Hit Rate          11.11%
>                 HSR Ham Strike Rate:        0.00%
>                 OCA Overall Accuracy:      50.00%
> 
> Another question, my global "Home" config setting is...
> 
>  Home /var/spool/dspam
> 
> so my users Dspam working directory is...
> 
>  /var/spool/dspam/data/renta.net/markc/*
> 
> but I would prefer that working directory to be the same
> as my regular virtual homedir where couriers' Maildir is.
>
What is the benefit or the benefit you see in doing so?


> Anyone have a suggestion how I could best set the Dspam
> working dir dynamically for each user ?
> 
Look at the localStore preference, but I am not sure that this is what you are 
looking for.


> --markc
>
Steve
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger?did=10

Reply via email to