The short answer is:  Bit errors affect voice just like they affect 
data.  There's no such thing as a "voice only" or a "data only" stream.

Every stream is complete with voice and data components.

"Silence" is still a voice stream that must be properly decoded, and if 
it got damaged on the way to the repeater or down from the repeater, you 
hear strange noises instead.  It happens often.

Have seen what you're describing before during all of the following:

- Station is weak into repeater (TX).
- Station is mobile and experiencing flutter/fading even though 
otherwise is in a location that it would otherwise be "full signal" copy 
at the repeater site.
- Repeater is being heard weakly by receiving station (RX), because of 
shielding or distance.
- Local interference on received signal by analog noise, mixing, or desense.
- Interference or desense at repeater site.
- HT battery dies in the middle of a transmission (audio always goes to 
"garble" in this case, the decoder is not looking or locked to signal 
strength in any way, so it keeps "trying" for a period of time).
- Doubling.  Happens quite often with numberous timer-based data 
transmission stations.

Additionally, there's no good tool (yet) for round-trip bit-error rate 
testing through the repeaters.

Many people are fooled into thinking that if they can talk through the 
repeater, they're in the equivalent of "full quieting" coverage on 
analog -- then they find that low-speed data won't pass without errors 
at all from that radio setup, antenna, power level, and location.

Personally with the popularity of dPlus links, thinking it's probably 
not a great idea to have a bunch of unattended beacons going through the 
links that can come and go at any time, so I tend to recommend dropping 
timer-based location data use altogether.

I have my rigs set up to do only PTT-based position reports unless 
there's a special need to know where all those stations are located for 
an event or something.

The radios do that very well and continuous position reporting for 
anything other than an event or a special mapping of coverage or 
something, seems like overkill.

But your experience with "garbled audio" sounds coming regularly from 
the speakers of radios that are monitoring this "supposedly all data 
only" traffic, is normal... if conditions aren't 100% perfect and no 
doubling ever happens, between the repeater and every node in the network.

Nate WY0X

Reply via email to