Morning Group,

    let me clarify what I am after......What I am looking for is a Dual rx 
radio. Thank you  also for clarifying what YMMV stands for. I was trying to 
figure out what that stood for so I asked. 

again thank you all very much for the input I really appreciate it.

73,

Ben




________________________________
From: JI1BQW <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:23:22 AM
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

  
Please note that none of the current D-Star radios is capable of dual
watch two DV-mode frequencies. If one is DV, another comes to FM. Dual
FM is OK.

73,
-- 
JI1BQW - Kay Ishikawa

----- Original Message -----
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:50:02 -0700
"John D. Hays" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ben,
> 
> No problem, YMMV, I wasn't suggesting the IC-80 at all, only to suggest 
> that it shares programming software with the ID-880 mobile radio.
> 
> Just for the record, the IC-80AD and ID-880 are both "dual band" (they 
> operate on both 2m and 70cm) but they are not "dual watch" (monitoring 
> two frequencies at one). For dual watch, you would have to go to the 
> IC-91AD or IC-92AD for handhelds, or the 2820H for a mobile.
> 
> The question is are you better served with a mobile or a handheld/amp 
> lash-up in your application. That is your decision to make.
> 
> Ben Ramler wrote:
> > 
> >
> > I don't want the IC-80 because its not dual band. thank you for the 
> > idea! I am still led to believe that this the route to take.
> >
> > thank you for the input John.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Ben K0BLR
> >
> 
> -- 
> John D. Hays
> Amateur Radio Station K7VE <<http://k7ve. org>http://k7ve. org>
> PO Box 1223
> Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
> VOIP/SIP: <mailto:john% 40hays.org>[email protected] <sip:<mailto: john%40hays. 
> org>[email protected]>
> Email: <mailto:john% 40hays.org>[email protected] <mailto:<mailto: john%40hays. 
> org>[email protected]>
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to