Buy the 2820. You won't be sorry and there have been some pretty good deals
round. Check Texas tower and HamCity. A friend bought the radio at Texas
Tower for around 519 and he ut123 for about 250 at Ham city.

 

Remember for the price you are get 4 radios in one,  2 for 440 and 2 for 2m.

 

Fran, W1FJM

 

 <http://www.miele-family.com/weather>
<http://www.miele-family.com/weather> 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Ben Ramler
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 10:11 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

 

  

Morning Group,

    let me clarify what I am after......What I am looking for is a Dual rx
radio. Thank you  also for clarifying what YMMV stands for. I was trying to
figure out what that stood for so I asked. 

again thank you all very much for the input I really appreciate it.

73,

Ben

________________________________
From: JI1BQW <[email protected]. <mailto:ji1bqw%40mbr.nifty.com> com>
To: dstar_digital@ <mailto:dstar_digital%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:23:22 AM
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] IC-91AD vs 92AD

  
Please note that none of the current D-Star radios is capable of dual
watch two DV-mode frequencies. If one is DV, another comes to FM. Dual
FM is OK.

73,
-- 
JI1BQW - Kay Ishikawa

----- Original Message -----
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:50:02 -0700
"John D. Hays" <[email protected] <mailto:john%40hays.org> > wrote:

> Ben,
> 
> No problem, YMMV, I wasn't suggesting the IC-80 at all, only to suggest 
> that it shares programming software with the ID-880 mobile radio.
> 
> Just for the record, the IC-80AD and ID-880 are both "dual band" (they 
> operate on both 2m and 70cm) but they are not "dual watch" (monitoring 
> two frequencies at one). For dual watch, you would have to go to the 
> IC-91AD or IC-92AD for handhelds, or the 2820H for a mobile.
> 
> The question is are you better served with a mobile or a handheld/amp 
> lash-up in your application. That is your decision to make.
> 
> Ben Ramler wrote:
> > 
> >
> > I don't want the IC-80 because its not dual band. thank you for the 
> > idea! I am still led to believe that this the route to take.
> >
> > thank you for the input John.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Ben K0BLR
> >
> 
> -- 
> John D. Hays
> Amateur Radio Station K7VE <<http://k7ve. org>http://k7ve. org>
> PO Box 1223
> Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
> VOIP/SIP: <mailto:john% 40hays.org>[email protected] <mailto:john%40hays.org>
<sip:<mailto: john%40hays. org>[email protected] <mailto:john%40hays.org> >
> Email: <mailto:john% 40hays.org>[email protected] <mailto:john%40hays.org>
<mailto:<mailto: john%40hays. org>[email protected] <mailto:john%40hays.org> >
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to