> >Digital voice on HF will NEVER catch on because it is a strong 
> >signal mode, and HF is the home of weak signals, well except for 80
> 
> Never is a long time, and vocoder technology marches on.  Already, 
> the biggest limitation is not technology, but patents and what we 
> hams can get hold of for an affordable price.

Free AMBE wouldn't eliminate the 10 db s/n technologic gap between usable hf 
digital and hf ssb, or resolve the bandwidth issues here in the USA.  The other 
hf digital obstacle is no "wow factor".  Hf digital, so what?  Even VHF digital 
by itself lacks a "wow factor".  Talking to NU5D across town digitally versus 
fm is no big thrill.  On the other hand, talking to JI1BQW half-way around the 
world using my mobile VHF/UHF rig is, so it's not digital voice per se that 
brings the "wow factor", it's the gateway interconnect and other features  of 
DStar such as reflectors that do.  On hf none of that is a big deal.  Sure 
there's a handful of folks who would/will use it, but it will never catch on.

73 -- John

Reply via email to