> D-PLUS was created before the DVDongle. D-PLUS is NOT REQUIRED for a D-STAR 
> repeater, or one that is connected to the Trust Server. 

Chronologically dplus appeared before the dongle, but conceptually?  The dongle 
market certainly appears to drive dplus development since.

> Again, DPLUS IS NOT REQUIRED! Of course not installing it would probably be 
> foolhardy as linking is pretty much a way of life for may repeaters.

Foolhardy? - "foolishly adventurous and bold" not to install dplus?  That may 
be an inappropriate characterization.

> People refusing to learn callsign routing IS NOT THE ONLY REASON. I know how 
> to do it (after all, I kinda wrote the book).  But I don't like its 
> implementation. I don't use it. I think that it is a relatively ill-conceived 
> function that was only half-heatedly though through. I believe that you also 
> may be making a mistake to believe that Icom's gateway implementation is the 
> way that it was intended to be utilized.

Yes, it is hard for old timers to give up old ways of operating and learn new 
concepts.

> I can with good conscious, state that without DPLUS, DSTAR would probably 
> have died. Or at least be at significantly lower levels of penetration than 
> today. A LOT of people enjoy listening to REF001C and the nets. A lot of 
> grant money has been spent with the capability to link repeaters pretty much 
> a requirement.

Now that truly is a foolhardy assertion!

73--John

Reply via email to