THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#134 - reintroduce the physical-functions User who did this - Bernd Flemisch (bernd) ---------- As was already mentioned, we should by no means alter the solution values in the output routines or cut of the values anywhere to fit within some physical range. I think that our customers should be able to deal with saturation values like -1e-14. I agree that we should not accept unphysical solutions violating a rounding errors tolerance as a converged solution from the Newton method. Since we should not undertake an effort for an empty set, can someone please come up with a case where this happens? ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=134#comment136 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
