THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. The following task has a new comment added:
FS#322 - remove superfluous "Dumux::" User who did this - Timo Koch (timokoch) ---------- I think it actually makes things more clear. It's then obvious that it comes from the Dumux namespace. I wouldn't go so far as to make it mandatory and not operate in namespace Dumux but I don't think it clutters the code. Also I experienced some difficulties with certain versions of GCC where something like typedef BoundingBoxTree<TypeTag> BoundingBoxTree; threw an error saying I redefine the symbol BoundingBoxTree with another meaning while typedef Dumux::BoundingBoxTree<TypeTag> BoundingBoxTree; worked just fine. ---------- More information can be found at the following URL: http://www.dumux.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=322#comment685 You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above. _______________________________________________ Dumux mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.uni-stuttgart.de/mailman/listinfo/dumux
