Follow-up Comment #1, patch #6353 (project duplicity):

Disclaimer: Only looked at the patch shortly; haven't tested or considered
thoroughly.

It looks to me like failures need to be handled properly (a try/finally
around the asynch operation, and some added book keeping to propagate the
failure to the front-end thread waiting on the result).


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6353>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/



_______________________________________________
Duplicity-tracker mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-tracker

Reply via email to