Hi,
> There is, however, a minor glitch in the code. If start_bof is true, and
> you set a start marker on the very first picture, and another one later
> (without an intervening stop marker), the first start marker will
> probably be ignored. The reason is that the code can't tell the
> difference between an explicit marker at 0 and an implicit one at BOF.
> Shouldn't be a big problem, though.

That's not a Bug that a Feature!!! :))
We don't need to know the difference...

Interactivly set markers which make no sense (START-marker without STOP, if it's
not the last one or STOP-marker without a START, if it's not the first one) are 
still ignored!

ciao
Ralph

PS: Who submits the 100th-Anniversary-Patch? ;-)


-- 
 =======================================================
  Ralph Glasstetter                                       
                                                                     phone      
               0721 359166
  Rüppurrer Str. 62                                        email   [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
  76137 Karlsruhe                                         fax/voice       01212 
5 107 16 958
 =======================================================
_______________________________________________________________________
Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 3 Monate
kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
DVBCUT-user mailing list
DVBCUT-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dvbcut-user

Reply via email to