Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The paper work for FSF is being done background by Michael Olson and >> I. I'll report progress when we get progresses. > > I'm very sorry to be late. > Could you someone take over the task? > I'd like to step back from the task.
Thanks for the effort you've put into this so far.
I could take over the Emacs merge effort. I got ERC into Emacs, so it
shouldn't be too hard to get DVC in.
> I think some of functions of DVC should be implemented in vc or
> vc-dired. There are some duplicated code and function among DVC and
> VC. e.g. annotation. Maybe DVC's annotation implementation is better
> because DVC does most of things asynchronously.
I dislike vc because of its non-asynchronous behavior and file-based
rather than commit-based view of working directories. I doubt that DVC
and vc can have any code in common, but I could be wrong. It would be
better IMHO just to get DVC into Emacs as-is.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 |
http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | |
Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgphXJ67NX2xF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
