Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just a question. Have you ever tired M-x vc-directory(= vc-dired)? > I think I can say vc-directory provides `commit-based view'. > Am I wrong? > > The biggest weak points of vc-dired are it cannot handle multiple > files and cannot run asynchronously. As you wrote removing the later > one is difficult. However I think I can remove the former one.
I tried it just now. It does not compare favorably to what DVC offers,
in any way. It does not show changes that happened to all files at
once. It puts too much space between entries. Its diff window is too
small. I can't imagine why anyone would willingly use it, unless their
VCS was not supported by DVC.el.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 |
http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | |
Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgp6XLKI0yAFu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
