On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Emily Ravenwood wrote: > What happens when the maintainer of a community is inactive on the > service for a long time? > > What appears to be a standing LJ policy *on paper*, that a comm with > a long-inactive maintainer will have a new maintainer appointed > randomly from the members, has been put into practice on LJ and seems > to be occasioning some bad reactions.
I understand (based on http://www.livejournal.com/abuse/policy.bml - I am not now, nor was ever, an abuse handler) that maintainer inactivity isn't enough for the APT to step in and appoint a new maintainer. There needs to be TOS violations or other incidents that require maintainer action. (And this is strictly for LiveJournal - Dreamwidth may do the same, something close, or something Different And Strange(tm).) _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
