On Jan 26, 2009, at 10:42 AM, PauAmma wrote: > I understand (based on http://www.livejournal.com/abuse/policy.bml > - I am not now, nor was ever, an abuse handler) that maintainer > inactivity isn't enough for the APT to step in and appoint a new > maintainer. There needs to be TOS violations or other incidents > that require maintainer action. (And this is strictly for > LiveJournal - Dreamwidth may do the same, something close, or > something Different And Strange(tm).)
Text of the notice is quoted here (http://asylums.insanejournal.com/ 07refugees/85861.html). Given what you say, it would seem to indicate either a) a policy change or b) a hoax. Be interesting to see which. In any case, I thought it raised a question of how DW will want to handle (or possibly not touch with a ten foot pole) cases of comm control transfer, since such cases appear to have been placed among the moderately hot-button topics. Cheers, ER _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
