hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Polls are stupid.
There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm development process. Shame on me! > All these recently added features seemed to me as if they are rather a > matter of popularity, not sanity. So go on. What's so insane? Go to LKML if you want to experience dictatorship. For me it the dwm development process seems to be kind of fair, Anselm mainly tries improve dwm based on the needs (and patches) of the people here on the mailing list unless they don't interfere with the development philosophy. So it's with the possibilities of the project (of course not everyone can have access to the main repository, but we use mercurial and therefore it's no problem you can maintain your own branch). But due to the development philosophy of dwm you can't make everyone happy and integrate every feature. > Dwm got off course and needs some clear objectives again! Well, it's your turn - list your critique here and I think it won't be ignored. Regards Matthias-Christian
