On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely > > sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and will to > > try and comprehend all the new DEFGEOM stuff (and neither I see a > > reason). > > > > Hence I vote -1 for all post 1122 releases. > > agree completely (not using +1 notation to avoid confusion). > > I'm still using two/more instances of 4.7 everywhere. Imho, the only > clean way of directly supporting multihead would be to put everything > currently in globals into a struct, and run multiple instances of the WM > in separate data structures, with a few well-defined crossing points > (such as: move client to the list of another screen) > > Regards, > Mate >
And the new changes have prompted me to switch to xmonad. I liked the old, simpler dwm. But you can't please everybody. -- Jeremy O'Brien aka neutral_insomniac GPG key: 0xB1140FDB http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/jeremy.asc Linux newo 2.6.24-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz
pgp8cX3FyuVeO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
