Actually it wasn't the BT Homeplug that was way off compliance. I think that 
was borderline dodgy when tested by the RSGB - so my mistake there (sorry about 
that, BT!).  I shouldn't insult BT because I get a great broadband service from 
them! There were however some "home networking" devices that used the mains 
wiring to transmit a pseudo ethernet network around the home.  They plugged 
into the 13 Amp mains supply and had an RJ45 connector to plug into a 
computer.  One of the big outlets sold them and although they were CE marked 
there was a huge amount of shortwave and medium wave QRM from them.

If anyone in the UK has still got problems with these, I can look through 
correspondence and try to find details.  It turned out that the importer had 
just stuck "CE" labels on so they could sell them here.  I'm damned if I can 
remember the name now.  It must be RF brain damage!!! :-)

Fortunately there's not much sign of BPL here since most areas now have wired 
broadband via phone lines or cable and we don't have the huge distances to 
bridge like you chaps in the USA.  Most of the home networking via mains cables 
died a death since ISPs now give free wireless hubs as part of the contract and 
most PCs - and all laptops - on sale now have wireless connectivity.  I'm 
old-fashioned and prefer Cat5 wired installations.

There's talk of replacing the last few miles of copper with fibre to domestic 
installations (which will help those of us who put RF into neighbours' phones) 
but I think given the financial climate this will probably have to wait.  

I still can't think who was selling those home networking devices that were 
fraudulently CE marked.  Can anyone else in UK remember?  It was a big name 
retailer.  Damn.  I think I'm reaching the "memory buffer overflow" stage of 
life........

cheers

D





--- On Tue, 30/12/08, DAVE WHITE <[email protected]> wrote:
From: DAVE WHITE <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?......and QRM.....
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 30 December, 2008, 10:24 AM

Hi all

On the QRM front, I've noticed a huge increase in RF noise from items
like Christmas lights this year.  Someone a couple of street away put
some twinkling LED lights in his garden, purchased from Tesco (a large
supermarket chain here in the UK).  These fill 160 and 80m with a
rasping noise over S9 and fill 20m with the same s9plus noise beaming
in that direction.  Clearly the wire to the lamps works like an
antenna, transmitting diode hash and rubbish from the switched mode
supply.  Needless to say, they're cheap Chinese trash from the Ping
Pong Poo Electrics Company (or whoever).  

Electrical gear that is sold in the EU is supposed to be tested and CE marked 
as compliant with standards, but enforcement of this is non-existent.  Even big 
companies like BT (British Temecom) falsely and fraudulently stamp "CE" on 
their home networking devices which are staggeringly non-compliant with RFI 
standards.

Anyway, this next bit is hilarious.  I got this reply to my message laughing at 
IBM, presumably from someone on the DX-CHAT group.

It's anonymous and comes from a non-existent email address.  I wonder if this 
is the mindset of the spineless little people who cause deliberate and 
anonymous QRM to dxpeditions:

QUOTE

            
            From: 
            
                "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
                
                
You arrogant bastard...

P.S.  I've worked in IT for 45 years, and fired dozens of arrogant a--------- 
like you.
END-QUOTE   

(bad language deleted by me)

I just love it when the reptiles come out from under their stones, don't you?  
Wouldn't you have thought he'd at least have the courage to put his name?  Now 
you know who was probably sending a carrier and dits all day over BS7H.....  

Happy New Year and Good DX to you all!

OILy


--- On Mon, 29/12/08, DAVE WHITE <[email protected]> wrote:
From: DAVE WHITE <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by Infoworld?
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Monday, 29 December,
 2008, 11:05 PM

Oh, so "notching" is a new development, eh?  Well it probably is if you're a 
dullard who works for a bunch of buffoons like IBM!

Maybe if Ray Blair talked the the ham radio operators (who amazingly still have 
clout) he'd find that we amazingly still have more knowledge and intelligence 
than monkeys in blue suits like him

cheers

Dave G0OIL

(PS I work in IT.  It's always my pleasure to fire IBM consultants off site.  
And EDS.  And Accenture. And Tata.......)

--- On Mon, 29/12/08, Ron
 Notarius W3WN <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <[email protected]>
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Dissed by
 Infoworld?
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Monday, 29 December, 2008, 7:59 PM

Nice little article on Infoworld's site today, about the 10 most under-reported 
tech stories of 2008.

Of interest to us is #6:  BPL is Back from the Dead  (see 
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/29/53FE-tech-underreported-powerline_1.html
 )

Of note in the article is this paragraph:  
 
"And another recent innovation, called notching, lets the chips switch 
frequencies when meeting interference. This upgrade should quiet the fears of 
ham radio operators (who amazingly enough have still have significant clout) 
and others that BPL will cause problems for various radio services, says Ray 
Blair, IBM's head of advanced networking. "

"Who amazingly enough have still have significant clout" ???

Never mind the bad English (don't they employ editors anymore?  or proof 
readers?).  I'm not sure if we
 should take that as an insult or a compliment.  What do you think?

73


-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

[email protected] 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
-----------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

[email protected] 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
-----------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

[email protected] 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
-----------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

[email protected] 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
-----------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to