Hi there,
I posted an opacity extension a while ago, at that time Richard mentioned
that it'd probably be more processor friendly if I'd used thread. So I got
at it and after a long session of looking at thread I finally found the
solution. Copy & Paste from the path animation extension and Tweak . I've
attached the files for this extension. To be able to use this one add the
following line to dynapi.js
DynAPI.addLibrary('dynapi.fx',["opacity","opacityanim"])
drop the opacity.js and opacityanim.js in "libs/dynapi/fx"
folder, the examples (dynapi.fx.opacity.html and dynapi.fx.opacityanim.html
) go with the other examples.(everything was run and tested with the
2000-01-05 release of DynAPI)
I also suggested making a commented version of the DynAPI,
to make understanding the code a bit easier. However, nobody (except for
Doug) reacted to that suggestion. I'd really like to start something like
this, as I think it would really broaden the number of developers working on
improving the DynAPI. This would mean setting a few standards on commenting
so that they can later easily be removed, and as you're the ones that are
really developing the DynAPI you'd have to tell me which way to go with the
commenting.
Ruairi
opacity_revisited.zip
