I vote for that.
I also think people need to be made more aware that extra functionality does
NOT
have to be added to the /api/*.js files..
they can VERY easilly be put into a sperate file and loaded as an extension
when needed,
in fact, I think some of the current core code could indeed be move into
extensions,
thereby making the core api a little tighter, while still allowing people to
use those functionalities, IF THEY NEED THEM..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Browser Language Support
> would it then be worth setting up a dynapi-ext list that is used to
discuss
> suggested code ADDITIONS.
>
> it would allow for discussion of further expansion of the api without
bogging
> down the developement list.
>
> this hopefully would also allow for users to make suggestions without
feeling
> out of their depth in the development list.
>
> I didn't mean to sound so defensive im my previous posts. it's 1:30 am
here and
> I should get some sleep.
> --
> Michael Pemberton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ: 12107010
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dynapi-Dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Free Edition
Download at: http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_index.cfm
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.237 / Virus Database: 115 - Release Date: 3/7/01
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
