Some say its over the top, others complain because it's 3 times larger, when
it simply fits the purpose of the DynAPI.
From my point of view, btw its probably biased since I submitted the code,
there is no signifigant increase in execution time and it will fix several
bugs with detecting various browsers and will also help us to properly adapt
the DynAPI to other browsers and platforms. So anyone complaining about the
length of code or the fact that it is 'too advanced' should take a closer
look at the purpose of developing cross-browser and cross-platform code.
This is just my opinion and shouldn't be interpreted as flaming or anything
else. My intention is only to show that if the code isn't implemented the
DynAPI will not be detecting the browsers or platforms correctly.
- [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Browser.js R... anders . noras
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Bro... Eytan Heidingsfeld
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ]... Cameron Hart
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Bro... JonathanErinDale
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Bro... Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ]... Steve Carroll
- [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Browser... JonathanErinDale
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ]... Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ]... Richard Bennett
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Bro... Scott, Leland
