Yes, I must say that bugfixes and suggestions DO get a lot reaction if they
are posted to the patch section.
Whatever happens, this submission has certainly NOT been ignored!
----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: [ dynapi-Patches-407882 ] Browser.js Recommended
Upgrade
>From looking at the code that is in the current browser.js file we attempt
to
do at least 2 things:
1. identify the browser
2. identify the platform
Here are the problems that I see. We only support MSIE or NS, so why do
allow for browsers that spoof, such as Opera, to get by? Why not explicity
detect them so that we can alert that they are not supported? When we
attempt to detect the platform we are using methods that are almost
guaranteed to fail.
I'm not saying that the entire thing should be included, but at the least
shouldn't we fix the most obvious problems which have an effect on the way
in
which the DynAPI works?
BTW, since I can't seem to find a list of the CURRENT GOALS, can someone
post
them to the list for me. I would like to learn more about them and see what
can be done to meet them before the future becomes the past and we get stuck
in the present.
_______________________________________________
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
