What's the benifit then?
> When I talk about using XHTML, I am talking about using XHTML1.0 strict or > transitional which is the next evolutionary step from HTML4.0. XHTML1.0 is > backward compatible to HTML4.0 browsers. It is also forward compatible to > future XML browsers. All XHTML1.0 does, is give you some rules on how you > can or cannot use standard html markup. It does not require a server side > engine for parsing. > > Look at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/ for more details. It really is not all > that much work to use XHTML over HTML. And no extra work from the users > stand point. > (No plugin required, batteries included) =;^) > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Melvin > Sent: November 15, 2001 9:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Documentation Project > > > Question: When we talk about using XML or XHTML.. are we talking > server-side? > I certainly hope so seeing as how NS4.x does ont have an XML parser.. > > I will not agree to forcing someone to download a plugin just to read our > docs.. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
