On 11/08/2011 01:43 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 06:41 PM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Chris Friesen
>>> I've got a board for which the vendor has supplied an igb driver
>>> claiming to be version 3.0.3.  I assume it's got some
>>> vendor-specific modifications but I don't know what they are.  I
>>> tried a stock 3.2.9 igb driver and it didn't work--it gave messages
>>> like:
>>>
>>> igb 0000:03:00.1: PCI INT A ->  GSI 40 (level, low) ->  IRQ 40 igb
>>> 0000:03:00.1: Hardware Initialization Failure igb 0000:03:00.1: PCI
>>> INT A disabled igb: probe of 0000:03:00.1 failed with error -5
>>>
>>> Is there somewhere I can download a stock 3.0.3 driver so I can
>
>
>> We have older versions on Source Forge, have you tried any of the
>> older ones?  Also, what is your hardware and who is your vendor?  If
>> you open an issue on Source Forge there will be a place to track and
>> post info.  Info I'll need to assist is a full output of lspci -vvv
>> and a full dmesg log from both versions of the driver.  Was there a
>> problem with the 3.0.3 version the vendor supplied?
>
>
> I've got some additional information.  A nice person sent me the 3.0.3
> tarball and I've diffed the vendor version against it and attached the
> delta.  As you can see, aside from pointless renaming of functions it
> appears to be adding support for a new phy and hardcoding various
> things based on board-specific knowledge.  I'm not quite sure why
> they're doing what they're doing to E1000_FUNC_2/E1000_FUNC_3.
>
> I'm not sure I'm allowed to specify what the vendor or overall product
> is, but the ethernet devices in question are DH89XXCC series and at
> least some of them correspond to front panel ports on an ATCA board.
>
> Is the support for the BCM PHY something that would make sense for
> future driver versions?
>
> Chris

Chris,

We currently have no plans to support a Broadcom PHY on the DH89XXCC
series part.

What appears to have happened is that the vendor who supplied you the
modified 3.0.3 driver appears to have forked the driver and rewritten
parts of the PHY code to support the Broadcom PHY.  As such if you are
looking for updates to that driver I would recommend going back to the
vendor who supplied you with that ATCA board for support.

Thanks,

Alex

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to