From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerl...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:24:41 +0300
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: >> From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eil...@broadcom.com> >> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:06:43 +0300 >> >>> Hopefully this series will be accepted so we can send follow up support >>> for the bnx2x as well. >> >> I think in two or three more iterations it will be merged. >> >> There are no objections on the fundamentals, it's just implementation >> details and coding style at this point. > > Dave, sorry, I might be a bit behind the rest of the reviewers, but I > just fail to understand nor find any reference that explains the > module param of ixgbe nor it makes sense to me to merge that piece of > the code upstream (its not for staging, correct?), as I wrote here > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136908123432072&w=2 basically, I > know you're not a great fun of module params (to say the least) and > surely not something named "allow_unsafe_removal", thoughts? It's one of those "implementation details", I hate it too. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ E1000-devel mailing list E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
