On 21/05/2013 11:43, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
>> It's one of those "implementation details", I hate it too.
>
> Maybe if we bake it on this list little further we can see how to get
> away from that, or what's the most non ugly way for that?

I'm all for proper review and fixing any issues before forcing 
"ugliness" and "black magic" on unsuspecting users.

Having said that, you failed to mention that your company sells 
userspace stack replacements.

Informal testing I did convinces me that for a given HW, the latencies 
you get with this patchset and with userspace busy-polling are about the 
same. (This is my personal opinion, I'm not authorized to talk on behalf 
of my company or anyone else.)

Why don't you try it out and tell us what you find.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit 
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

Reply via email to