Edoardo Comar wrote:
> Tim Haley wrote:
>
>> If we
>> could narrow down the search by making a selection from basic
>> functionality choices it would be much easier. It could include
>> things like Refactoring, Search/Replace, Editor (per file type),
>> Layout, Configuration, Installation, Debugging, ...
>
>
> AAARGHH no more fields please!!
> What makes the ITN system easy to use is the limited number of fields.
> What makes other bug trackers crap is the enormous amount of fields they
> expose.
I guess there are some things we don't need in ITN, but I still think a
simple way of dividing requests into separate areas would be reasonable.
Of course one could use keywords instead, but people will
never be able to agree which keywords should be used, and we will
occasionally misspell keywords or forget to include them. With 10-15
simple categories (and a "generic/unknown" category) this shouldn't be
as much of a problem.
_______________________________________________
Eap-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
