Yes, the open API is planned for Ariadna (but not the first EAP builds). Will see later if it is rich enough to implement VI-style editing commands.
Best regards, Valentin Kipiatkov ----------------------------------------------------------- IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ "Develop with pleasure" ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Bachelder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Feature Request: integrate VI commands into editor > Is this planned for the next EAP? > > On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 07:18, Valentin Kipiatkov wrote: > > This (and other similar ones) might be possible to implement as plug-ins > > when Open API is available. > > > > Best regards, > > Valentin Kipiatkov > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > IntelliJ Software, http://www.intellij.com/ > > "Develop with pleasure" > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Christian Cabanero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:21 PM > > Subject: [Eap-list] Feature Request: integrate VI commands into editor > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a weird feature request but the absolutely only thing I could > > > think of that would make IDEA even better for some of us old-school > > > coding types is to integrate vi-like editor commands into the editor > > > view. Yes, I'm probably in the significant minority in requesting this > > > feature, but I'd sure like to see it. :-) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Chrisitan > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:21 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Eap-list digest, Vol 1 #906 - 21 msgs > > > > > > > > > > > > Send Eap-list mailing list submissions to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than > > > "Re: Contents of Eap-list digest..." > > > > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > > > 1. Re: Clearing Cache (Christopher Cobb) > > > 2. Re[2]: [Eap-list] Runtime parser says incorrect Java is valid > > > (Konstantin Sobolev) > > > 3. #540 NPE (Carlos Costa e Silva) > > > 4. DOS window and bug report (Nivy, Ofer) > > > 5. RE: #540 NPE (Carlos Costa e Silva) > > > 6. RE: help? (Jim Moore) > > > 7. Re: DOS window and bug report (Chris Merrill) > > > 8. Re: DOS window and bug report (Christopher Cobb) > > > 9. Problems with keyboard navigation in menu bar (Aldona Majorek) > > > 10. How to navigate from stacktrace to source:line using keyboard? > > > (Aldona Majorek) > > > 11. RE: Change method's exception signature? (Dimiter Dimitrov) > > > 12. error parsing bug in #539 (Chris Merrill) > > > 13. RE: DOS window and bug report (Armond Avanes) > > > 14. RE: DOS window and bug report (Thomas Singer) > > > 15. Questions for some jikes options (Thomas Singer) > > > 16. RE: help? (Deblauwe, Wim) > > > 17. VSS Show Differences Bug. (Scott Curtis) > > > 18. Re: Questions for some jikes options (Royston Firth) > > > 19. auto import identification bug (Michael Kirby) > > > 20. Re: auto import identification bug (Erb) > > > 21. RE: auto import identification bug (North D) > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 1 > > > Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 07:35:23 -0500 > > > From: Christopher Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Clearing Cache > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Bryan Young wrote: > > > > > > > I have a problem with IDEA that shows up in every other IDE I use. It > > > > seems to me to be fairly simple to fix: When I remove a java file > > > > (from the IDE), the corresponding class file remains in the cache. > > > > This can cause errors that are very difficult to track down. As a > > > > general rule, whenever I get the urge to throw my laptop against the > > > > wall, the first thing I do, is delete the cache and completely rebuild > > > > the code. As smart as IDEA is about removing files from CVS and > > > > keeping track of dependencies, I would think this is a problem I > > > > shouldn't have to deal with anymore. Could the next version of IDEA > > > > be modified to remove unnecessary class files from its cache? Maybe > > > > it could do this when files are renamed or moved from within the IDE. > > > > > > JBuilder handles this if 'sync' mode is set. But I agree, a 'smart' IDE > > > should definitely do this. > > > > > > cc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 2 > > > Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:00:46 +0300 > > > From: Konstantin Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reply-To: Konstantin Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Organization: SupportWizard > > > To: Michael Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re[2]: [Eap-list] Runtime parser says incorrect Java is valid > > > <3C369E37.25823.ECBCD4E@localhost> > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hello Michael, > > > > > > Saturday, January 05, 2002, 2:33:27 PM, you wrote: > > > > > > MK> I agree that total error checking is too much. But adding better > > > checking for missing > > > MK> semi-colon & parenthesis would be great. Beyond that, I don't find > > > very many > > > MK> errors, or they are somewhat infrequent, and having the compiler > > > check them is > > > MK> fine. > > > > > > MK> I suppose for me it would be a time / bloat trade off. If IDEA can > > > do this without the > > > MK> intellij guys spending a tremendous amount of time, or bloating IDEA > > > such that I > > > MK> need to upgrade my computer to run it, then put as much in as you > > > want. > > > > > > *Just to look* at complete run-time error checking visit > > > www.omnicore.com and try codeguide > > > > > > Of course their IDE is much weaker but code validaition on the fly > > > really impresses > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Konstantin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 3 > > > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:15:56 +0000 > > > From: (Carlos Costa e Silva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Eap-list] #540 NPE > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Win2k sp2, jdk-1.3.1, idea 537 > > > > > > Twice in the output console. > > > No idea when. > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.by.d(by.java:35) > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.by.a(by.java:92) > > > at com.intellij.psi.impl.source.bq.a(bq.java:10) > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.bh.a(bh.java:5) > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.bh.run(bh.java:20) > > > at com.intellij.psi.impl.r.a(r.java:200) > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.r.run(r.java:23) > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484) > > > -- > > > Carlos Costa e Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 4 > > > From: "Nivy, Ofer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [Eap-list] DOS window and bug report > > > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 10:49:32 +0200 > > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > As you may already heard from many users, the DOS window that opens with > > > intellij, is rather annoying. > > > > > > There are two reasons why I don't remove it: > > > The first one is that I don't know how! > > > There was a something in the FAQ > > > (http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=540462), but it doesn't work for > > > me. > > > If you can provide this information, it would be nice. > > > > > > The second, which is the subject of this mail, is that intellij's own > > > errors > > > are reported in this window. Since I want to help making this product > > > even > > > better than it is now, I try to report on errors and exceptions that > > > appear > > > there. > > > > > > As a programmer I know that even a stack trace may not be enough for > > > debugging a problem. The first and most important step in bug report is > > > to > > > describe how to reconstruct it, or the closest thing to that. > > > > > > The problem is that the first time that I notice that there was a > > > problem, > > > is when I accidentally switch to the DOS window and see the printed > > > error or > > > stack trace. By then, there is no chance that I'll know or remember when > > > was > > > the time of that error, and what I did that may have caused it. All I > > > can do > > > is send the stack trace, which is rather useless. > > > > > > I've seen many bug reports with only "I've got this exception..." and > > > I'm > > > sure that most of the errors are not even reported. > > > > > > My suggestion: > > > 1. Remove the DOS window. > > > 2. Show these errors/exception in a dialog, WHEN the error happens. > > > 3. Don't bother to implement some fancy report mechanism. A text pane > > > with > > > the stack trace and some additional data (e.g. JVM version, OS), > > > formatted > > > in your preference, will do the work. > > > 4. Important: make it optional. Not all the users wishes to report bugs, > > > and > > > they would prefer not to be bothered with this dialog. If there'll be an > > > error that appears frequently, even the most active bug reporter, will > > > wish > > > to turn this feature (dialog) off. > > > 5. Write everything to a log file. > > > > > > > > > I'm sure that this solution will annoy fewer users, and help us to send > > > us > > > better bug reports. > > > > > > Ofer > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 5 > > > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 09:56:14 +0000 > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] #540 NPE > > > From: (Carlos Costa e Silva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > Win2k sp2, jdk-1.3.1, idea 537 > > > > > > Small mistype: as the subject said, idea 540 not 537. > > > > > > > Twice in the output console. > > > > No idea when. > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException > > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.by.d(by.java:35) > > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.by.a(by.java:92) > > > > at com.intellij.psi.impl.source.bq.a(bq.java:10) > > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.bh.a(bh.java:5) > > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.bh.run(bh.java:20) > > > > at com.intellij.psi.impl.r.a(r.java:200) > > > > at com.intellij.codeInsight.highlighting.r.run(r.java:23) > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484) > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 6 > > > From: Jim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] help? > > > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:58:24 -0500 > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > While the online help could be better (help could ALWAYS be better, no > > > matter how good it is), here's the definative list of refactorings and > > > how > > > they work: http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/index.html > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > On > > > Behalf Of Deblauwe, Wim > > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:46 AM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: [Eap-list] help? > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > maybe you guys can do something about the help because it is almost > > > non-existent and I keep wondering what all those refactorings mean ;-) > > > > > > Wim > > > > > > ------------- > > > Ing. Wim Deblauwe > > > BarcoView > > > Medical Imaging Systems > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 7 > > > Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 10:17:42 -0800 > > > From: Chris Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] DOS window and bug report > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > We've implemented something similar - and it has been > > > a great convenience for our customers. Our next step > > > is to automatically submit a bug report with all > > > pertinent information (version, error log, open file, > > > license info, etc.) and the user's description of what > > > they were doing at the time. > > > > > > Nivy, Ofer wrote: > > > > > > > My suggestion: > > > > 1. Remove the DOS window. > > > > 2. Show these errors/exception in a dialog, WHEN the error happens. > > > > 3. Don't bother to implement some fancy report mechanism. A text pane > > > with > > > > the stack trace and some additional data (e.g. JVM version, OS), > > > formatted > > > > in your preference, will do the work. > > > > 4. Important: make it optional. Not all the users wishes to report > > > bugs, and > > > > they would prefer not to be bothered with this dialog. If there'll be > > > an > > > > error that appears frequently, even the most active bug reporter, will > > > wish > > > > to turn this feature (dialog) off. > > > > 5. Write everything to a log file. > > > > > > > > > ********************************* > > > Chris Merrill > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ********************************* > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 8 > > > Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 14:40:34 -0500 > > > From: Christopher Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] DOS window and bug report > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > The state of the object where the exception occurred can be very useful > > > as well. > > > A well implemented toString() is all you need. This will need to be > > > done for > > > every object, but that's a good idea anyway. > > > > > > cc > > > > > > Chris Merrill wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > We've implemented something similar - and it has been > > > > a great convenience for our customers. Our next step > > > > is to automatically submit a bug report with all > > > > pertinent information (version, error log, open file, > > > > license info, etc.) and the user's description of what > > > > they were doing at the time. > > > > > > > > Nivy, Ofer wrote: > > > > > > > > > My suggestion: > > > > > 1. Remove the DOS window. > > > > > 2. Show these errors/exception in a dialog, WHEN the error happens. > > > > > 3. Don't bother to implement some fancy report mechanism. A text > > > pane with > > > > > the stack trace and some additional data (e.g. JVM version, OS), > > > formatted > > > > > in your preference, will do the work. > > > > > 4. Important: make it optional. Not all the users wishes to report > > > bugs, and > > > > > they would prefer not to be bothered with this dialog. If there'll > > > be an > > > > > error that appears frequently, even the most active bug reporter, > > > will wish > > > > > to turn this feature (dialog) off. > > > > > 5. Write everything to a log file. > > > > > > > > ********************************* > > > > Chris Merrill > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ********************************* > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 9 > > > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:11:40 -0500 > > > From: "Aldona Majorek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-To: Ada Majorek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [Eap-list] Problems with keyboard navigation in menu bar > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > IDEA build#540 Windows 2000, Sun JDK 1.3.1 > > > > > > try this. > > > > > > 1. Move focus to any "border" view. > > > 2. Activate menu bar. > > > 3. Press right or left arrow. // This is handled by menubar > > > 4. Press rigth or left arrow again. // This time menu selection is not > > > moved, the keypress is handled by "border" view. > > > > > > It does not happend it you activate menubar from edit view. > > > > > > Thanks, for great product. > > > > > > :-) Ada > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 10 > > > Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:18:07 -0500 > > > From: "Aldona Majorek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-To: Ada Majorek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [Eap-list] How to navigate from stacktrace to source:line using > > > keyboard? > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I have a stacktrace in run view with blue links to source:line where it > > > happend. > > > > > > I can navigate to that source:line using mouse, but how to navigate > > > there using keyboard? > > > > > > :-) Ada > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 11 > > > From: Dimiter Dimitrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] Change method's exception signature? > > > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:42:31 +0900 > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > +5 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 5:48 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Change method's exception signature? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I just realised - "Change Method Signature..." in build > > > > #535 does not > > > > > include the ability to change the "throws" clause of the method. > > > > > > > > > > When refactoring interfaces and classes which use > > > > overridden methods, > > > > > this can be a pain manually. I just never noticed until now > > > > that IDEA > > > > > doesn't seem to support this. > > > > > > > > > > i.e. I had: > > > > > > > > > > public interface MyInterface > > > > > { > > > > > void myMethod(); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > ...and I wanted to add a "throws ExceptionA, ExceptionB" to the > > > > > signature, and have it do it to all the implementing classes too. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > ***************************************************** > > > > Walter Szewelanczyk > > > > IS Director > > > > M.W. Sewall & CO. email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 259 Front St. Phone : (207) 442-7994 x 128 > > > > Bath, ME 04530 Fax : (207) 443-6284 > > > > ***************************************************** > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 12 > > > Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 19:07:37 -0800 > > > From: Chris Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Eap-list] error parsing bug in #539 > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > There is a (valid) compile error in the following > > > class file, Test.java: > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > public class Test > > > { > > > public static void main(String[] args) > > > { > > > System.out.println("hello!"); > > > } > > > } > > > > > > z > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > obviously, the extraneous character in the last > > > line is the culprit. > > > > > > The following appears in the messages pane: > > > Information: 1 error > > > D:\Trainer\Test.java > > > Error: 'class' or 'interface' expected > > > > > > Please note that the line number is not shown in the messages > > > pane output. In addition, using Edit->Source on that line > > > will open the correct file in the editor...but it does not > > > move to the correct line - leading to difficult diagnosis. > > > The Sun compiler properly identifies the line number of the > > > error. In addition, exporting the messages to a file from > > > IDEA shows that the error line was properly identified by > > > the compiler and recieved by IDEA - but was apparently not > > > parsed correctly: > > > > > > Information: 1 error > > > D:\Trainer\Test.java > > > Error: line (9) 'class' or 'interface' expected > > > > > > TIA, > > > Chris > > > > > > ********************************* > > > Chris Merrill > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ********************************* > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 13 > > > From: "Armond Avanes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] DOS window and bug report > > > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:10:42 +0330 > > > charset="us-ascii" > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Well, it will be nice to report the errors/warnings in a dialog. But the > > > problem is that this clue won't work fine if the program freezes and you > > > don't have the report dialog/window up. > > > IDEA has been freezed (for some reasons) and I don't have access to > > > details. Any clue here?! > > > > > > The only solution I can say is to log all the errors on a file too in > > > this case (we don't have DOS window)! > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Armond > > > > > > > My suggestion: > > > > 1. Remove the DOS window. > > > > 2. Show these errors/exception in a dialog, WHEN the error happens. > > > > 3. Don't bother to implement some fancy report mechanism. A text pane > > > with > > > > the stack trace and some additional data (e.g. JVM version, OS), > > > formatted > > > > in your preference, will do the work. > > > > 4. Important: make it optional. Not all the users wishes to report > > > bugs, > > > > and > > > > they would prefer not to be bothered with this dialog. If there'll be > > > an > > > > error that appears frequently, even the most active bug reporter, will > > > > wish > > > > to turn this feature (dialog) off. > > > > 5. Write everything to a log file. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure that this solution will annoy fewer users, and help us to > > > send us > > > > better bug reports. > > > > > > > > Ofer > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 14 > > > Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 11:09:35 +0100 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] DOS window and bug report > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > a really problem is, if an application (here IDEA) hangs in a dead-lock. > > > If > > > the console is open, you can press CTRL-Break (?) to get a thread-dump. > > > If > > > the application runs without a console, there is no possibility to get a > > > > > > thread-dump - at least I don't know of any. Reporting everything in a > > > log-file could not help there, too. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Thomas Singer > > > _____________ > > > smartcvs.com > > > > > > At 12:10 07.01.02 +0330, you wrote: > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > >Well, it will be nice to report the errors/warnings in a dialog. But > > > the > > > >problem is that this clue won't work fine if the program freezes and > > > you > > > >don't have the report dialog/window up. > > > >IDEA has been freezed (for some reasons) and I don't have access to > > > >details. Any clue here?! > > > > > > > >The only solution I can say is to log all the errors on a file too in > > > >this case (we don't have DOS window)! > > > > > > > >Best Regards, > > > >Armond > > > > > > > > > My suggestion: > > > > > 1. Remove the DOS window. > > > > > 2. Show these errors/exception in a dialog, WHEN the error happens. > > > > > 3. Don't bother to implement some fancy report mechanism. A text > > > pane > > > >with > > > > > the stack trace and some additional data (e.g. JVM version, OS), > > > >formatted > > > > > in your preference, will do the work. > > > > > 4. Important: make it optional. Not all the users wishes to report > > > >bugs, > > > > > and > > > > > they would prefer not to be bothered with this dialog. If there'll > > > be > > > >an > > > > > error that appears frequently, even the most active bug reporter, > > > will > > > > > wish > > > > > to turn this feature (dialog) off. > > > > > 5. Write everything to a log file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure that this solution will annoy fewer users, and help us to > > > >send us > > > > > better bug reports. > > > > > > > > > > Ofer > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Eap-list mailing list > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 15 > > > Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 11:18:59 +0100 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [Eap-list] Questions for some jikes options > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm using jikes for 97% of my compilations. But since I do not know the > > > real meaning of the options "Do full dependence check" and "Compile in > > > incremental mode", I do not use them. > > > > > > Is there anybody, who can explain these two options in more detail and > > > tell > > > me, whether they are useful, whether they could save compile time? > > > Thanks > > > in advance. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Thomas Singer > > > _____________ > > > smartcvs.com > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 16 > > > From: "Deblauwe, Wim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] help? > > > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:25:25 +0100 > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > thank you but what i meant was that most of the help pages contain no > > > text > > > at all. I'm using 2.5. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jim Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: zondag 6 januari 2002 14:58 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] help? > > > > > > > > > While the online help could be better (help could ALWAYS be better, no > > > matter how good it is), here's the definative list of refactorings and > > > how > > > they work: http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/index.html > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > On > > > Behalf Of Deblauwe, Wim > > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 4:46 AM > > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > Subject: [Eap-list] help? > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > maybe you guys can do something about the help because it is almost > > > non-existent and I keep wondering what all those refactorings mean ;-) > > > > > > Wim > > > > > > ------------- > > > Ing. Wim Deblauwe > > > BarcoView > > > Medical Imaging Systems > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 17 > > > Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:39:29 +0000 > > > From: Scott Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Eap-list] VSS Show Differences Bug. > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > When calling the VSS Show Differences option for the first time, the > > > mouse wheel works on the resulting differences display/dialog. Yet in > > > subsequent calls to Show Differences the mouse wheel doesn't work. Petty > > > > > > in the wider scheme of things and considering how good the IDE is in > > > every other way but I thought it should be mentioned. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Scott Curtis > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 18 > > > From: "Royston Firth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] Questions for some jikes options > > > Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:24:29 +0000 > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jikes/faq/user-ind > > > ex.shtml > > > > > > should answer your question. > > > > > > > > > >From: Thomas Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: [Eap-list] Questions for some jikes options > > > >Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 11:18:59 +0100 > > > > > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > >I'm using jikes for 97% of my compilations. But since I do not know the > > > >real meaning of the options "Do full dependence check" and "Compile in > > > >incremental mode", I do not use them. > > > > > > > >Is there anybody, who can explain these two options in more detail and > > > tell > > > >me, whether they are useful, whether they could save compile time? > > > Thanks > > > >in advance. > > > > > > > >Best regards, > > > >Thomas Singer > > > >_____________ > > > > smartcvs.com > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >Eap-list mailing list > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 19 > > > From: "Michael Kirby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Organization: Xerox Corporation > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:21:12 -0500 > > > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Eap-list] auto import identification bug > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Opena file with a lot of imports, where the import is something like > > > java.io.* > > > > > > change tools->options->imports to be a big number so intellij won't put > > > the java.io.* > > > back in. > > > > > > delete the import java.io.*. > > > > > > It will highlight a bunch of stuff that needs to be replaced. It asks > > > you to press alt- > > > enter. Keep pressing this until it goes off the bottom of the screen. > > > > > > Select on one of the highlighted tabs to continue the process on a later > > > page, and > > > suddenly all of the errors are reported as being "cannot resolve > > > symbol". > > > > > > If you uncheck the syntax highlighting options, close options, and then > > > recheck them > > > it will find missing imports again, until it scrolls off the screen. > > > > > > There is something really weird going on. > > > > > > Mike > > > --- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the > > > subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 20 > > > Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 13:11:09 -0500 > > > From: Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] auto import identification bug > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > This is because the alt-enter functionality only works on symbols on the > > > > > > current screen. > > > IDEA will not highlight other references in the file until you actually > > > scroll to them. Maybe we could use an "add all imports" option. > > > > > > Michael Kirby wrote: > > > > > > > Opena file with a lot of imports, where the import is something like > > > java.io.* > > > > > > > > change tools->options->imports to be a big number so intellij won't > > > put the java.io.* > > > > back in. > > > > > > > > delete the import java.io.*. > > > > > > > > It will highlight a bunch of stuff that needs to be replaced. It asks > > > you to press alt- > > > > enter. Keep pressing this until it goes off the bottom of the screen. > > > > > > > > Select on one of the highlighted tabs to continue the process on a > > > later page, and > > > > suddenly all of the errors are reported as being "cannot resolve > > > symbol". > > > > > > > > If you uncheck the syntax highlighting options, close options, and > > > then recheck them > > > > it will find missing imports again, until it scrolls off the screen. > > > > > > > > There is something really weird going on. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > --- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the > > > > subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Erb > > > > > > ============================================================== > > > "The only time I like in the morning is afternoon." > > > - Russell D. Cooper > > > > > > "If you do everything, then you're all done." > > > - Melissa F. Cooper > > > > > > "Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. > > > There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." > > > - Larry Wall > > > ============================================================== > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > Message: 21 > > > From: North D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-list] auto import identification bug > > > Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:25:41 -0000 > > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > +1 for add all imports. It would need to pop up a dialog for ambiguous > > > imports though. Maybe just list them all with checkboxes, and you > > > select > > > the ones you want? > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Erb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 07 January 2002 18:11 > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-list] auto import identification bug > > > > > > > > > > > > This is because the alt-enter functionality only works on > > > > symbols on the > > > > current screen. > > > > IDEA will not highlight other references in the file until > > > > you actually > > > > scroll to them. Maybe we could use an "add all imports" option. > > > > > > > > Michael Kirby wrote: > > > > > > > > > Opena file with a lot of imports, where the import is > > > > something like java.io.* > > > > > > > > > > change tools->options->imports to be a big number so > > > > intellij won't put the java.io.* > > > > > back in. > > > > > > > > > > delete the import java.io.*. > > > > > > > > > > It will highlight a bunch of stuff that needs to be > > > > replaced. It asks you to press alt- > > > > > enter. Keep pressing this until it goes off the bottom of > > > > the screen. > > > > > > > > > > Select on one of the highlighted tabs to continue the > > > > process on a later page, and > > > > > suddenly all of the errors are reported as being "cannot > > > > resolve symbol". > > > > > > > > > > If you uncheck the syntax highlighting options, close > > > > options, and then recheck them > > > > > it will find missing imports again, until it scrolls off the screen. > > > > > > > > > > There is something really weird going on. > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > --- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > To obtain my PGP public key, mail "SEND PUB KEY" in the > > > > > subject to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Erb > > > > > > > > ============================================================== > > > > "The only time I like in the morning is afternoon." > > > > - Russell D. Cooper > > > > > > > > "If you do everything, then you're all done." > > > > - Melissa F. Cooper > > > > > > > > "Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. > > > > There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." > > > > - Larry Wall > > > > ============================================================== > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************ > > > *************** > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > > > intended > > > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > > > addressed. > > > If you have received this email in error please notify > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] immediately. > > > > > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for > > > the > > > presence of computer viruses. > > > ************************************************************************ > > > *************** > > > > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > > > > End of Eap-list Digest > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
