On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:43:05 +0000 Joachim Hein <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am wondering how do we want to organise us in future? Do we want to > continue with the goolfc idea or do we go for a “core” cuda and cuDNN? I > feel this needs standardising soonish. On this topic, does anyone have any opinions about making use of Magma instead of standard blas in whatever "cuda" toolchain we come up with? Even further, is anyone willing to explore this magic: http://spcl.inf.ethz.ch/Research/Parallel_Programming/Polly-ACC/ There was a talk at ISC claiming they achieve 60% of performance on unmodified C code compared to manually ported OpenACC code. -- Jurij Pečar HPC Engineer, IT Operations, IT Services EMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany Room 13-401
