Hi Kenneth, Kenneth Hoste <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi Loris, > > On 23/02/2021 13:42, Loris Bennett wrote: >> Thanks for the information, John. >> >> So there seem to be a number of solutions: >> >> 1. Software author patches software >> 2. EasyConfig author patches software >> 3. EasyConfig author builds against pre-10 GCC > > There's another option if you don't want to patch the code: you could add > -fcommon to the compiler flags via the easyconfig file (but that's not > recommended). > > >> >> Would it be worthwhile having something in the EB docs about the issue >> which would be useful for those involved in cases 1 and 2? > > There's some excellent information on this at > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gcc_10_porting_notes/fno_common . Thanks for the link. In case 1, I was thinking along the lines of writing to the author of some software and being able to say: I want to include your software in EasyBuild (link to EB home), but you need to patch you program for me to do so (link to page in EB documentation describing problem, possibly containing other links to GCC 10 porting). In case 2, the EasyConfig author him- or herself would then just be able to find the information within the EB documentation. It just seems to me that this might be a problem which people will run into again and again until the developers themselves move to GCC 10 and so it could be handy to have a canonical page in the EB documentation to point to. Cheers, Loris > regards, > > Kenneth > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Loris >> >> John Dey <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> The default with GCC 10.2 is to compile with -fn-common which is causing >>> many issues with packages. In every case, I have encountered the software >>> should be patched. >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html >>> >>> John Dey >>> [email protected] >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:45 AM Loris Bennett <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Starting from >>> >>> Subread-2.0.0-GCC-8.3.0.eb >>> >>> I updated the package to 2.0.1 and changed the compiler version to >>> 10.2.0 to build: >>> >>> Subread-2.0.1-GCC-10.2.0.eb >>> >>> However, this fails with multiple errors all like the following: >>> >>> >>> /trinity/shared/easybuild/software/binutils/2.35-GCCcore-10.2.0/bin/ld.gold: >>> error: core-junction.o: multiple definition of 'replica_index' >>> >>> /trinity/shared/easybuild/software/binutils/2.35-GCCcore-10.2.0/bin/ld.gold: >>> core.o: previous definition here >>> >>> There is a Debian bug report which mentions a similar issue >>> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957846 >>> >>> Regarding the solutions given there, I can confirm that building with >>> GCC 9.2.0 works, however when >>> >>> export CC=gcc-10 CXX=g++-10 >>> >>> is set, as suggested in the bug report, the build fails with the same >>> error as above. >>> >>> Is this a known problem with GCC 10? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Loris >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Loris Bennett (Hr./Mr.) >>> ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email [email protected] >>>
