On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Julien CARSIQUE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That's correct. Shell functions are convenient functions for
> recursive calls over those directories. Using them only speed up
> time needed by the developer to issue required commands (one instead
> of about fifteen).
great, i assumed as much, thanks.
> I.e. if you want to pull and update, you will have to run "hg pull
> && hg up" on each directory but with nuxeo shell functions: "hgf
> pull && hgf up" on root only.
which leads me to my next question, if i might. as i see it, all of
those clones represent independent hg repositories, but you still have
to be careful to keep them in sync. from looking at the tags, it
appears that the latest stable release is 5.2.0, and progress is being
made towards 5.2.1, if i read your tags correctly.
now, the instructions for checking out the stable 5.2 branch seems
to refer to a small number of "1.5" tags (for nuxeo-{common, runtime,
core}). but the current checkout *seems* to have standardized on the
5.2.x naming convention. am i reading that correctly? otherwise, i'm
not sure what some of those "#1.5" revision numbers mean.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
ECM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/ecm
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/options/ecm
