There would have been a time when I wouldnt have supported any type of
international interference by Americans but since I saw that the
isolationists are headed by someone like Pat Buchanan I began to question
that viewpoint. I would have to agree with Joe that Clinton had an
obligation to attack the terrorists because Bin Laden's target was
Americans and American supporters. Clinton wouldnt have needed to ask but
in fact he did call to get support on his actions before he bombed.
The notion that somehow Lewinsky had something to do with Clintons
decision is ridiculous.
Bertina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, Joe E. Dees wrote:
> Date sent: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
> Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Arlene Plevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: state terrorism
> Originally to: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I don't think it's a question of ceding; I believe it's a question of
> > using our "strength" in a more moral fashion.
> >
>
> It would be immoral to do nothing and allow this man to go on killing.
> > Arlene Plevin
> > On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, Joe E. Dees wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > Would you cede those roles to Osama Bin Ladin? He's certainly
> > > demonstrated his willingness to assume all three.
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
