Hi!
Let me explain what I meant:
Greedy - putting money about life and love
Anarchy - not wanting rule/non-conformaty
Elitist - putting oneself in a status above others by use of power
Now - the problem we have is with Anarchial, greedy, elitists - People who
want no rules - no code of ethics or code of morals, people who put money and
status above life and love and people who use power to put themselves above
others.
They are the corporate CEOS - not wanting rules - finding loopholes to evade
DEMOCRACY -non-conformists - They are the corporate CEOS - elitists using
their power to put forth their own good and greed!
Did I explain that?
They are our problem! You are right - stop them!
Religion - applies in that religion gives us moral codes to live by - however,
you made a good point about how it sometimes does not apply to anarchism
Peace
Angela
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 25 11:18:24 1998
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:17:50 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: re sex, part of life
Margueritte,
Do you read what I right?
I said I was pro-life, pro-choice< pro-volunatary population control, anti-
mandatory control -
I said that I do not know when life starts -Since I am pro-life - I can not
decide if abortion is murder or not - or at what point it is - so I remain -
it is between you, them, whoever and GOD until otherwise proven not to be!
I am a contemplative - not doctrinated (dogmatic) I lean more towards gnostic
then orthodox - but I do believe that we need a code of morals!
I am for educating the masses about their rights about their own bodies and
spiritual beliefs - let people decide for themselves.
I believe in the automony of the individual -
I believe that any love is good love - not a bigoted opinion!
Now, you are, of course, entitled to your own opinion of me - however, I
really do not clearly see how you formed this unenlightened opinion of me as a
dogmatic bigot - given the above statements! But feel free to maintain your
position - it is your right!
Peace!
Angela
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 25 11:25:59 1998
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:25:36 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Family size and religion
In a message dated 98-10-23 18:18:45 EDT, you write:
<< As an atheist I dont give a rats patootie who agrees with me but if you
want agreement and you want compromise then you should couch your language
a little better.
Bertina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Bertina - I do not agree with you so therefore I should couch my language?
Excuse me - If you do not like the mere mention of the word GOD then I suggest
you pre-delete all of my messages - because I will free free and uncouched to
express my opinions about GOD without worrying about it - This is not about
compromise - this is about getting to the root of problems - discussing
solutions and opinions - sharing values, inspiring, etc.
Peace!
Angela
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 25 11:39:30 1998
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:39:11 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Looking for Gaia spiritual and/or religious movements
Hi!
Candi you are right _ we need more then self-love - Self-actualization is only
the first step - I worded it wrong! After we love ourselves and know
ourselves and what we want - we are free to love others and share what we want
and to unite as self-actualized people working towards a shared vision of a
more humane world!
Thanks and Peace!
Angela
