Gendered notions? Personal attacks on people is not a gendered notion,
it's futile, irrelevant, and rude for anyone.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 9 09:09:19 1999
>Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8/ITS-4.2/csf) with SMTP id KAA15613;
> Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:09:12 -0700 (MST)
>Received: from mailgate.nau.edu (mailgate.nau.edu [134.114.96.19])
> by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8/ITS-4.2/csf) with ESMTP id KAA15507
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:07:04 -0700 (MST)
>Received: from dana.ucc.nau.edu (dana.ucc.nau.edu [134.114.138.2])
> by mailgate.nau.edu (PMDF V5.2-29 #31141)
> with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:06:58 -0700 (MST)
>Received: from localhost (jlu@localhost) by dana.ucc.nau.edu
(8.8.8/2.12b-nau)
> with SMTP id KAA09623 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,
> 09 Mar 1999 10:06:58 -0700 (MST)
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 10:06:57 -0700 (MST)
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Precedence: bulk
>From: Jessica Leann Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Reaction
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>X-To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
>
>
>Hi all!
>
>Although I absolutely think that we should be respectful of one
another,
>our diverse locations, experiences, beliefs, contributions and so
forth,
>I wonder if (in general - I am not referring to this list only)
>condemnations that one is "attacking" or that one is "bitter" and/or
>"angry" are actually well coded ways
>of simply saying that "as a girl" one is not supposed to express
>passionate arguements, or respond aggressively to a topic or situation,
or
>have any opinions on anything at all. I certainly do not expect to
agree
>with everything that is said here, and in reality I am glad for that,
>because otherwise I would find this list boring and uninspiring. We
can
>disagree, and still be respectful of one another without resorting to
>gendered notions of what the proper "female manner of response" should
>be, no?.
>
>
>Jessica Urban
>
>
>On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Meg Gawler wrote:
>
>> This is hello and goodbye.
>> I am a new subscriber since a day and a half, and had hoped that
STUDIES IN
>> WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT would include people interested in sharing
>> experiences in promoting gender equity in community-based natural
resource
>> management projects worldwide.
>> Of course neocolonialism is a huge and perennial potential pitfall
that
>> merits deep reflection and constructive discussion.
>> However, I confess that I am disappointed to see this list-server
dominated
>> and spammed by embittered flame-throwers from the U.S.
>> Please take me off your list.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
