Hayley-
I think you need to go back and re-read my post - I think you missed the
point......
Jessica
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Hayley Lynch wrote:
> Gendered notions? Personal attacks on people is not a gendered notion,
> it's futile, irrelevant, and rude for anyone.
>
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 9 09:09:19 1999
> >Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> > by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8/ITS-4.2/csf) with SMTP id KAA15613;
> > Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:09:12 -0700 (MST)
> >Received: from mailgate.nau.edu (mailgate.nau.edu [134.114.96.19])
> > by csf.Colorado.EDU (8.8.8/8.8.8/ITS-4.2/csf) with ESMTP id KAA15507
> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:07:04 -0700 (MST)
> >Received: from dana.ucc.nau.edu (dana.ucc.nau.edu [134.114.138.2])
> > by mailgate.nau.edu (PMDF V5.2-29 #31141)
> > with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:06:58 -0700 (MST)
> >Received: from localhost (jlu@localhost) by dana.ucc.nau.edu
> (8.8.8/2.12b-nau)
> > with SMTP id KAA09623 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,
> > 09 Mar 1999 10:06:58 -0700 (MST)
> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 10:06:57 -0700 (MST)
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Precedence: bulk
> >From: Jessica Leann Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Reaction
> >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >MIME-version: 1.0
> >Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >X-To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
> >
> >
> >Hi all!
> >
> >Although I absolutely think that we should be respectful of one
> another,
> >our diverse locations, experiences, beliefs, contributions and so
> forth,
> >I wonder if (in general - I am not referring to this list only)
> >condemnations that one is "attacking" or that one is "bitter" and/or
> >"angry" are actually well coded ways
> >of simply saying that "as a girl" one is not supposed to express
> >passionate arguements, or respond aggressively to a topic or situation,
> or
> >have any opinions on anything at all. I certainly do not expect to
> agree
> >with everything that is said here, and in reality I am glad for that,
> >because otherwise I would find this list boring and uninspiring. We
> can
> >disagree, and still be respectful of one another without resorting to
> >gendered notions of what the proper "female manner of response" should
> >be, no?.
> >
> >
> >Jessica Urban
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Meg Gawler wrote:
> >
> >> This is hello and goodbye.
> >> I am a new subscriber since a day and a half, and had hoped that
> STUDIES IN
> >> WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT would include people interested in sharing
> >> experiences in promoting gender equity in community-based natural
> resource
> >> management projects worldwide.
> >> Of course neocolonialism is a huge and perennial potential pitfall
> that
> >> merits deep reflection and constructive discussion.
> >> However, I confess that I am disappointed to see this list-server
> dominated
> >> and spammed by embittered flame-throwers from the U.S.
> >> Please take me off your list.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
