Not really. Because I am trying to locate the president
of EcoFem! 

> ----------
> From:         vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Friday, December 10, 1999 2:56 AM
> To:   STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> Subject:      RE: Society for Human Population Control
> 
> What makes you think thay? I'm not. Are you being nasty?
> On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 09:04:26 +0800  Wong Ee Ling 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Vicki...are you the "president' of ECOFEM?
> > 
> > > ----------
> > > From:     vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Reply To:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent:     Tuesday, December 07, 1999 8:08 PM
> > > To:       STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> > > Subject:  Re: Society for Human Population Control
> > > 
> > > Has anyone read either of Bob Frissell's books? He talks 
> > > about paradigm shifts and population problems and stuff. I 
> > > can't remember, I read it a long time ago but I do remember 
> > > it was good. There was something about sacred geometry 
> > > which was a bit odd...
> > > On Thu, 2 Dec 1999 15:39:07 +0000 (GMT) "N.Kaul" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > Yes, paridigm shift!
> > > > > Overpopulation in ecological terms means both population density
> and
> > > carrying 
> > > > > capacity of the land ('third world' overpopulation) PLUS
> development
> > > and 
> > > > > technology issues ('first world' overconsumption).  Both have to
> do
> > > with 
> > > > > male-dominated ideologies.  Development means controlling the
> earth's 
> > > > > reproductive capacities, and population issues often involve
> > > patriarchal 
> > > > > systems controlling women's reproductivity.  I think we have to
> look
> > > at both. 
> > > > >  Why does it have to be either/or?  If nothing else, ecofeminism
> > > should be 
> > > > > all-inclusive, because the issues are all related.
> > > > 
> > > > could not agree with you more!  the interconnectedness of everything
> is 
> > > > so often overlooked.
> > > > nitasha
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > ----------------------
> > > vikki charles
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> 
> ----------------------
> vikki charles
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to